Compare
Kingsholme vs Pimpama
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 7.5 km apart · Kingsholme profile · Pimpama profile
Kingsholme Pimpama
Pimpama and Kingsholme are neighbouring areas with very different lifestyles. Pimpama is a much larger community where renting is common (56.9%) and many people live in de facto relationships (20.9%). In contrast, Kingsholme is a smaller area where typical weekly household incomes are far higher at $3,150, compared to $1,863 in Pimpama. Kingsholme also has a higher proportion of people who have completed Year 12 and more households earning over $3,000 a week.
Both areas share a similar drive time to the city, taking around 34 to 36 minutes. While they are close by, Pimpama is (somewhat walkable) and has many homes within a 15-minute walk of a school or park. Kingsholme is (car-dependent), with no homes within walking distance of a school or grocery store. This contrast is also seen in their housing, as Kingsholme has more homes owned outright and more detached houses.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 281
- First area, 2016: 286
- First area, 2021: 782
- Second area, 2011: 3,211
- Second area, 2016: 9,396
- Second area, 2021: 24,601
- First area, 2011: 38 yrs
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 29 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 27 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 29 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Kingsholme: 0.0% males, 1.1% females; 85+ in Pimpama: 0.1% males, 0.3% females
- 80–84 in Kingsholme: 0.5% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Pimpama: 0.3% males, 0.3% females
- 75–79 in Kingsholme: 0.6% males, 0.9% females; 75–79 in Pimpama: 0.8% males, 0.7% females
- 70–74 in Kingsholme: 1.4% males, 1.0% females; 70–74 in Pimpama: 1.1% males, 1.1% females
- 65–69 in Kingsholme: 2.0% males, 2.2% females; 65–69 in Pimpama: 1.2% males, 1.3% females
- 60–64 in Kingsholme: 2.5% males, 2.0% females; 60–64 in Pimpama: 1.2% males, 1.4% females
- 55–59 in Kingsholme: 3.4% males, 2.5% females; 55–59 in Pimpama: 1.4% males, 1.6% females
- 50–54 in Kingsholme: 3.6% males, 3.8% females; 50–54 in Pimpama: 1.9% males, 2.2% females
- 45–49 in Kingsholme: 3.3% males, 3.0% females; 45–49 in Pimpama: 2.4% males, 2.3% females
- 40–44 in Kingsholme: 5.1% males, 4.4% females; 40–44 in Pimpama: 3.0% males, 3.1% females
- 35–39 in Kingsholme: 4.3% males, 4.9% females; 35–39 in Pimpama: 4.6% males, 4.4% females
- 30–34 in Kingsholme: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 30–34 in Pimpama: 5.1% males, 5.8% females
- 25–29 in Kingsholme: 1.3% males, 2.4% females; 25–29 in Pimpama: 5.3% males, 6.1% females
- 20–24 in Kingsholme: 1.5% males, 1.3% females; 20–24 in Pimpama: 3.6% males, 4.3% females
- 15–19 in Kingsholme: 2.8% males, 4.1% females; 15–19 in Pimpama: 2.6% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Kingsholme: 6.5% males, 5.6% females; 10–14 in Pimpama: 3.8% males, 3.6% females
- 5–9 in Kingsholme: 6.1% males, 3.6% females; 5–9 in Pimpama: 4.9% males, 4.4% females
- 0–4 in Kingsholme: 3.6% males, 2.9% females; 0–4 in Pimpama: 5.4% males, 5.4% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $680
- First area, 2016: $654
- First area, 2021: $1,037
- Second area, 2011: $702
- Second area, 2016: $750
- Second area, 2021: $856
- First area, 2011: $1,357
- First area, 2016: $1,812
- First area, 2021: $3,150
- Second area, 2011: $1,459
- Second area, 2016: $1,596
- Second area, 2021: $1,863
- First area, 2011: $1,271
- First area, 2016: $1,792
- First area, 2021: $2,983
- Second area, 2011: $1,511
- Second area, 2016: $1,603
- Second area, 2021: $1,906
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.2
- First area, 2016: 3.4
- First area, 2021: 3.7
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 3.1
- Second area, 2021: 3.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $250
- First area, 2016: $300
- First area, 2021: $460
- Second area, 2011: $365
- Second area, 2016: $410
- Second area, 2021: $440
- First area, 2011: $2,167
- First area, 2016: $2,167
- First area, 2021: $2,994
- Second area, 2011: $2,400
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $1,978
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Kingsholme with nearby areas
Compare Pimpama with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Kingsholme vs Pimpama [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL31546/kingsholme/vs/SAL32318/pimpama