Compare
Kiels Mountain vs Rosemount
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 3.3 km apart · Kiels Mountain profile · Rosemount profile
Kiels Mountain Rosemount
Rosemount and Kiels Mountain are neighbouring areas on the Sunshine Coast with different housing and income profiles. Kiels Mountain is more affluent, with a typical weekly household income of $2,163 compared to $1,490 in Rosemount. It also has a higher share of detached houses (100%) and larger homes, with 90.3% having three or more bedrooms. Rosemount is more walkable, with more amenity types within a 15-minute walk and 29.8% of homes located near a park, compared to just 5.2% in Kiels Mountain.
These two areas share a similar mix of full-time workers and similar typical weekly rents, but they are diverging in their workforce trends. The gap in employment has widened, with 66.2% of adults working or looking for work in Kiels Mountain, which is far higher than the 55.7% in Rosemount. While both areas have more residents born overseas than the national figure, Kiels Mountain has a higher proportion of people with university degrees (26.6%) compared to Rosemount (19.6%).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 657
- First area, 2016: 664
- First area, 2021: 714
- Second area, 2011: 1,301
- Second area, 2016: 1,585
- Second area, 2021: 1,851
- First area, 2011: 40 yrs
- First area, 2016: 43 yrs
- First area, 2021: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 49 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 48 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Kiels Mountain: 0.4% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Rosemount: 1.3% males, 1.9% females
- 80–84 in Kiels Mountain: 1.1% males, 0.8% females; 80–84 in Rosemount: 1.6% males, 2.0% females
- 75–79 in Kiels Mountain: 2.1% males, 1.8% females; 75–79 in Rosemount: 3.1% males, 3.4% females
- 70–74 in Kiels Mountain: 3.8% males, 3.6% females; 70–74 in Rosemount: 3.0% males, 3.9% females
- 65–69 in Kiels Mountain: 2.7% males, 4.4% females; 65–69 in Rosemount: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 60–64 in Kiels Mountain: 3.0% males, 2.7% females; 60–64 in Rosemount: 4.1% males, 3.4% females
- 55–59 in Kiels Mountain: 3.2% males, 4.0% females; 55–59 in Rosemount: 3.7% males, 3.3% females
- 50–54 in Kiels Mountain: 3.0% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Rosemount: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in Kiels Mountain: 4.5% males, 3.7% females; 45–49 in Rosemount: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 40–44 in Kiels Mountain: 3.7% males, 4.7% females; 40–44 in Rosemount: 2.7% males, 3.2% females
- 35–39 in Kiels Mountain: 3.0% males, 1.9% females; 35–39 in Rosemount: 2.8% males, 2.8% females
- 30–34 in Kiels Mountain: 3.0% males, 3.2% females; 30–34 in Rosemount: 2.5% males, 2.3% females
- 25–29 in Kiels Mountain: 1.9% males, 0.7% females; 25–29 in Rosemount: 1.3% males, 1.4% females
- 20–24 in Kiels Mountain: 1.4% males, 1.0% females; 20–24 in Rosemount: 2.5% males, 2.6% females
- 15–19 in Kiels Mountain: 3.8% males, 2.1% females; 15–19 in Rosemount: 2.5% males, 2.6% females
- 10–14 in Kiels Mountain: 4.0% males, 3.6% females; 10–14 in Rosemount: 2.8% males, 3.3% females
- 5–9 in Kiels Mountain: 4.5% males, 2.7% females; 5–9 in Rosemount: 2.5% males, 2.9% females
- 0–4 in Kiels Mountain: 3.4% males, 3.0% females; 0–4 in Rosemount: 2.9% males, 2.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $521
- First area, 2016: $668
- First area, 2021: $769
- Second area, 2011: $546
- Second area, 2016: $565
- Second area, 2021: $701
- First area, 2011: $1,394
- First area, 2016: $1,775
- First area, 2021: $2,163
- Second area, 2011: $1,229
- Second area, 2016: $1,222
- Second area, 2021: $1,490
- First area, 2011: $1,367
- First area, 2016: $1,843
- First area, 2021: $2,184
- Second area, 2011: $1,325
- Second area, 2016: $1,490
- Second area, 2021: $1,916
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 3.1
- First area, 2021: 3.0
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $250
- First area, 2016: $360
- First area, 2021: $445
- Second area, 2011: $315
- Second area, 2016: $350
- Second area, 2021: $420
- First area, 2011: $1,712
- First area, 2016: $1,800
- First area, 2021: $2,167
- Second area, 2011: $1,887
- Second area, 2016: $1,820
- Second area, 2021: $2,000
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Kiels Mountain with nearby areas
Compare Rosemount with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Kiels Mountain vs Rosemount [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL31525/kiels-mountain/vs/SAL32471/rosemount