Compare
Diddillibah vs Rosemount
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 3.9 km apart · Diddillibah profile · Rosemount profile
Diddillibah Rosemount
Rosemount and Diddillibah are neighbouring areas on the Sunshine Coast. Rosemount has a larger share of homes with three or more bedrooms (78.7% compared to 59.5%) and a higher proportion of people aged 65 and over (26.4% versus 19.9%). In contrast, Diddillibah is far more connected, with 48.7% of homes within a 10 minute walk of public transport compared to 0% in Rosemount. Diddillibah also has more separate houses (91.4% versus 78.3%) and a much higher share of homes owned outright (46.5% versus 36.2%).
These differences in accessibility and housing are stark, but other life patterns are similar. Both areas have almost the same typical weekly household income, around $1,400, and nearly identical rates of adults with a bachelor degree. While the gaps in public transport and walkability remain wide, the two areas track closely in their share of First Nations residents and the proportion of people who use a language other than English at home.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 1,157
- First area, 2016: 1,403
- First area, 2021: 1,703
- Second area, 2011: 1,301
- Second area, 2016: 1,585
- Second area, 2021: 1,851
- First area, 2011: 45 yrs
- First area, 2016: 45 yrs
- First area, 2021: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 49 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 48 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Diddillibah: 0.8% males, 0.5% females; 85+ in Rosemount: 1.3% males, 1.9% females
- 80–84 in Diddillibah: 1.0% males, 1.4% females; 80–84 in Rosemount: 1.6% males, 2.0% females
- 75–79 in Diddillibah: 2.0% males, 1.5% females; 75–79 in Rosemount: 3.1% males, 3.4% females
- 70–74 in Diddillibah: 3.0% males, 3.2% females; 70–74 in Rosemount: 3.0% males, 3.9% females
- 65–69 in Diddillibah: 3.8% males, 3.0% females; 65–69 in Rosemount: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 60–64 in Diddillibah: 3.6% males, 3.6% females; 60–64 in Rosemount: 4.1% males, 3.4% females
- 55–59 in Diddillibah: 4.1% males, 4.0% females; 55–59 in Rosemount: 3.7% males, 3.3% females
- 50–54 in Diddillibah: 4.8% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Rosemount: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in Diddillibah: 3.8% males, 5.0% females; 45–49 in Rosemount: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 40–44 in Diddillibah: 2.8% males, 2.9% females; 40–44 in Rosemount: 2.7% males, 3.2% females
- 35–39 in Diddillibah: 2.7% males, 2.4% females; 35–39 in Rosemount: 2.8% males, 2.8% females
- 30–34 in Diddillibah: 1.5% males, 1.8% females; 30–34 in Rosemount: 2.5% males, 2.3% females
- 25–29 in Diddillibah: 1.9% males, 1.8% females; 25–29 in Rosemount: 1.3% males, 1.4% females
- 20–24 in Diddillibah: 2.4% males, 2.0% females; 20–24 in Rosemount: 2.5% males, 2.6% females
- 15–19 in Diddillibah: 4.1% males, 2.8% females; 15–19 in Rosemount: 2.5% males, 2.6% females
- 10–14 in Diddillibah: 3.9% males, 4.4% females; 10–14 in Rosemount: 2.8% males, 3.3% females
- 5–9 in Diddillibah: 3.7% males, 2.2% females; 5–9 in Rosemount: 2.5% males, 2.9% females
- 0–4 in Diddillibah: 2.2% males, 1.9% females; 0–4 in Rosemount: 2.9% males, 2.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $469
- First area, 2016: $564
- First area, 2021: $683
- Second area, 2011: $546
- Second area, 2016: $565
- Second area, 2021: $701
- First area, 2011: $950
- First area, 2016: $1,267
- First area, 2021: $1,424
- Second area, 2011: $1,229
- Second area, 2016: $1,222
- Second area, 2021: $1,490
- First area, 2011: $1,156
- First area, 2016: $1,486
- First area, 2021: $2,080
- Second area, 2011: $1,325
- Second area, 2016: $1,490
- Second area, 2021: $1,916
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $295
- First area, 2016: $280
- First area, 2021: $330
- Second area, 2011: $315
- Second area, 2016: $350
- Second area, 2021: $420
- First area, 2011: $1,517
- First area, 2016: $1,733
- First area, 2021: $2,200
- Second area, 2011: $1,887
- Second area, 2016: $1,820
- Second area, 2021: $2,000
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Diddillibah with nearby areas
Compare Rosemount with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Diddillibah vs Rosemount [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL30843/diddillibah/vs/SAL32471/rosemount