Compare
Forest Glen vs Kiels Mountain
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.2 km apart · Forest Glen profile · Kiels Mountain profile
Forest Glen Kiels Mountain
Forest Glen (Qld) and Kiels Mountain are neighbouring areas on the Sunshine Coast that offer very different lifestyles. Forest Glen (Qld) is more accessible, with a walkability score of 3.8 (mostly car-dependent) and far more public transport stops and amenities within walking distance. In contrast, Kiels Mountain is car-dependent, with a walkability score of 0.1 and no public transport stops. Kiels Mountain has larger homes, with 90.3% having three or more bedrooms compared to 63.6% in Forest Glen (Qld), and far higher typical incomes for First Nations households ($4,250 compared to $2,583).
Both areas are almost identical in the share of people born overseas, which sits at 20.9% for each. This common international background exists alongside other similarities, such as having about the same proportion of children under 15. While they share these traits, the two areas differ in their demographics; Forest Glen (Qld) is noticeably older and has seen far more people move in over the last five years. Kiels Mountain has a higher share of adults with a bachelor degree or higher and more households earning $3,000 or more per week.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 789
- First area, 2016: 1,390
- First area, 2021: 1,657
- Second area, 2011: 657
- Second area, 2016: 664
- Second area, 2021: 714
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 35 yrs
- First area, 2021: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 43 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Forest Glen: 0.9% males, 0.6% females; 85+ in Kiels Mountain: 0.4% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Forest Glen: 1.4% males, 1.6% females; 80–84 in Kiels Mountain: 1.1% males, 0.8% females
- 75–79 in Forest Glen: 4.3% males, 4.3% females; 75–79 in Kiels Mountain: 2.1% males, 1.8% females
- 70–74 in Forest Glen: 3.6% males, 6.2% females; 70–74 in Kiels Mountain: 3.8% males, 3.6% females
- 65–69 in Forest Glen: 2.4% males, 3.9% females; 65–69 in Kiels Mountain: 2.7% males, 4.4% females
- 60–64 in Forest Glen: 2.0% males, 2.8% females; 60–64 in Kiels Mountain: 3.0% males, 2.7% females
- 55–59 in Forest Glen: 2.2% males, 2.8% females; 55–59 in Kiels Mountain: 3.2% males, 4.0% females
- 50–54 in Forest Glen: 3.0% males, 2.8% females; 50–54 in Kiels Mountain: 3.0% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in Forest Glen: 3.2% males, 3.3% females; 45–49 in Kiels Mountain: 4.5% males, 3.7% females
- 40–44 in Forest Glen: 2.3% males, 3.3% females; 40–44 in Kiels Mountain: 3.7% males, 4.7% females
- 35–39 in Forest Glen: 3.4% males, 3.4% females; 35–39 in Kiels Mountain: 3.0% males, 1.9% females
- 30–34 in Forest Glen: 1.9% males, 2.8% females; 30–34 in Kiels Mountain: 3.0% males, 3.2% females
- 25–29 in Forest Glen: 1.6% males, 2.0% females; 25–29 in Kiels Mountain: 1.9% males, 0.7% females
- 20–24 in Forest Glen: 1.6% males, 1.7% females; 20–24 in Kiels Mountain: 1.4% males, 1.0% females
- 15–19 in Forest Glen: 2.4% males, 2.5% females; 15–19 in Kiels Mountain: 3.8% males, 2.1% females
- 10–14 in Forest Glen: 3.4% males, 3.1% females; 10–14 in Kiels Mountain: 4.0% males, 3.6% females
- 5–9 in Forest Glen: 3.9% males, 2.5% females; 5–9 in Kiels Mountain: 4.5% males, 2.7% females
- 0–4 in Forest Glen: 3.6% males, 3.2% females; 0–4 in Kiels Mountain: 3.4% males, 3.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $498
- First area, 2016: $671
- First area, 2021: $656
- Second area, 2011: $521
- Second area, 2016: $668
- Second area, 2021: $769
- First area, 2011: $1,184
- First area, 2016: $1,486
- First area, 2021: $1,387
- Second area, 2011: $1,394
- Second area, 2016: $1,775
- Second area, 2021: $2,163
- First area, 2011: $1,206
- First area, 2016: $1,633
- First area, 2021: $1,815
- Second area, 2011: $1,367
- Second area, 2016: $1,843
- Second area, 2021: $2,184
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.9
- Second area, 2016: 3.1
- Second area, 2021: 3.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $300
- First area, 2016: $448
- First area, 2021: $500
- Second area, 2011: $250
- Second area, 2016: $360
- Second area, 2021: $445
- First area, 2011: $2,150
- First area, 2016: $2,100
- First area, 2021: $2,089
- Second area, 2011: $1,712
- Second area, 2016: $1,800
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Forest Glen with nearby areas
Compare Kiels Mountain with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Forest Glen vs Kiels Mountain [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL31062/forest-glen/vs/SAL31525/kiels-mountain