Compare
Coochin vs Mount Alford
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 8.5 km apart · Coochin profile · Mount Alford profile
Coochin Mount Alford
Mount Alford and Coochin are neighbouring rural areas in the Scenic Rim. Mount Alford is more residential in nature, with 100% of homes being separate houses and a higher share of people living alone (28.7% compared to 16.7% in Coochin). It also has better local access, with about 40% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a school or park. Coochin has a more prosperous profile, with a typical weekly household income of $1,875, which is well higher than the $1,275 seen in Mount Alford. Education levels also differ, with 52.5% of Coochin residents completing Year 12, far higher than the 42.0% in Mount Alford.
These two areas have tracked closely since 2011, remaining very similar in many ways. They share the same typical resident age of 54 years and have nearly identical rates of volunteering and people needing daily help. Both areas are very car-reliant, as neither has any public transport stops or departures. This consistency extends to their families, where typical weekly incomes for families are almost the same, sitting around $2,000 to $2,100.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 312
- First area, 2016: 96
- First area, 2021: 115
- Second area, 2011: 344
- Second area, 2016: 268
- Second area, 2021: 294
- First area, 2011: 49 yrs
- First area, 2016: 51 yrs
- First area, 2021: 54 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 53 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 54 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Coochin: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Mount Alford: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Coochin: 0.0% males, 2.8% females; 80–84 in Mount Alford: 1.0% males, 1.0% females
- 75–79 in Coochin: 2.8% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Mount Alford: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 70–74 in Coochin: 3.7% males, 0.0% females; 70–74 in Mount Alford: 4.1% males, 3.4% females
- 65–69 in Coochin: 10.1% males, 0.0% females; 65–69 in Mount Alford: 3.8% males, 5.8% females
- 60–64 in Coochin: 6.4% males, 2.8% females; 60–64 in Mount Alford: 7.2% males, 6.9% females
- 55–59 in Coochin: 6.4% males, 4.6% females; 55–59 in Mount Alford: 4.8% males, 5.5% females
- 50–54 in Coochin: 0.0% males, 10.1% females; 50–54 in Mount Alford: 3.8% males, 4.5% females
- 45–49 in Coochin: 4.6% males, 6.4% females; 45–49 in Mount Alford: 4.1% males, 3.1% females
- 40–44 in Coochin: 0.0% males, 6.4% females; 40–44 in Mount Alford: 2.1% males, 0.0% females
- 35–39 in Coochin: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 35–39 in Mount Alford: 0.0% males, 3.1% females
- 30–34 in Coochin: 3.7% males, 0.0% females; 30–34 in Mount Alford: 2.4% males, 1.0% females
- 25–29 in Coochin: 7.3% males, 0.0% females; 25–29 in Mount Alford: 1.4% males, 3.1% females
- 20–24 in Coochin: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 20–24 in Mount Alford: 1.0% males, 1.0% females
- 15–19 in Coochin: 0.0% males, 3.7% females; 15–19 in Mount Alford: 1.4% males, 1.0% females
- 10–14 in Coochin: 0.0% males, 3.7% females; 10–14 in Mount Alford: 3.1% males, 3.8% females
- 5–9 in Coochin: 3.7% males, 5.5% females; 5–9 in Mount Alford: 1.7% males, 2.7% females
- 0–4 in Coochin: 5.5% males, 0.0% females; 0–4 in Mount Alford: 1.4% males, 3.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $494
- First area, 2016: $550
- First area, 2021: $774
- Second area, 2011: $500
- Second area, 2016: $629
- Second area, 2021: $725
- First area, 2011: $945
- First area, 2016: $1,021
- First area, 2021: $1,875
- Second area, 2011: $987
- Second area, 2016: $1,218
- Second area, 2021: $1,275
- First area, 2011: $1,137
- First area, 2016: $1,312
- First area, 2021: $2,125
- Second area, 2011: $1,008
- Second area, 2016: $1,437
- Second area, 2021: $2,023
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.1
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $180
- First area, 2021: $200
- Second area, 2011: $157
- Second area, 2016: $220
- Second area, 2021: $280
- First area, 2011: $1,625
- First area, 2016: $1,083
- First area, 2021: $1,774
- Second area, 2011: $1,733
- Second area, 2016: $1,625
- Second area, 2021: $1,517
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Coochin with nearby areas
Compare Mount Alford with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Coochin vs Mount Alford [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL30671/coochin/vs/SAL31934/mount-alford