Compare
Mount Alford vs Wallaces Creek
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 6.1 km apart · Mount Alford profile · Wallaces Creek profile
Mount Alford Wallaces Creek
Mount Alford and Wallaces Creek are neighbouring rural areas in the Scenic Rim. They differ sharply in wealth and age; the typical weekly household income in Wallaces Creek is $2,312, which is far higher than the $1,275 seen in Mount Alford. Wallaces Creek also has a much higher share of people who finished Year 12 (62.3% compared to 42.0% in Mount Alford) and more homes owned outright (69.6% versus 45.1%). In contrast, Mount Alford is an older area, with 25.5% of people aged 65 and over, compared to 14.9% in Wallaces Creek.
Both areas have tracked similarly since 2011, remaining very rural places where everyone lives in separate houses and no one uses public transport to commute. They share nearly identical proportions of people born overseas and those who speak no English. This stability is seen alongside a common reliance on cars, as neither area has any public transport stops or a 15-minute walk to groceries or health services.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 344
- First area, 2016: 268
- First area, 2021: 294
- Second area, 2016: 58
- Second area, 2021: 74
- First area, 2011: 48 yrs
- First area, 2016: 53 yrs
- First area, 2021: 54 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 49 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 50 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Mount Alford: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Wallaces Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Mount Alford: 1.0% males, 1.0% females; 80–84 in Wallaces Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Mount Alford: 3.4% males, 3.4% females; 75–79 in Wallaces Creek: 0.0% males, 5.5% females
- 70–74 in Mount Alford: 4.1% males, 3.4% females; 70–74 in Wallaces Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 65–69 in Mount Alford: 3.8% males, 5.8% females; 65–69 in Wallaces Creek: 5.5% males, 0.0% females
- 60–64 in Mount Alford: 7.2% males, 6.9% females; 60–64 in Wallaces Creek: 0.0% males, 3.3% females
- 55–59 in Mount Alford: 4.8% males, 5.5% females; 55–59 in Wallaces Creek: 11.0% males, 9.9% females
- 50–54 in Mount Alford: 3.8% males, 4.5% females; 50–54 in Wallaces Creek: 4.4% males, 6.6% females
- 45–49 in Mount Alford: 4.1% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Wallaces Creek: 4.4% males, 9.9% females
- 40–44 in Mount Alford: 2.1% males, 0.0% females; 40–44 in Wallaces Creek: 6.6% males, 0.0% females
- 35–39 in Mount Alford: 0.0% males, 3.1% females; 35–39 in Wallaces Creek: 4.4% males, 6.6% females
- 30–34 in Mount Alford: 2.4% males, 1.0% females; 30–34 in Wallaces Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 25–29 in Mount Alford: 1.4% males, 3.1% females; 25–29 in Wallaces Creek: 4.4% males, 0.0% females
- 20–24 in Mount Alford: 1.0% males, 1.0% females; 20–24 in Wallaces Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Mount Alford: 1.4% males, 1.0% females; 15–19 in Wallaces Creek: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 10–14 in Mount Alford: 3.1% males, 3.8% females; 10–14 in Wallaces Creek: 3.3% males, 4.4% females
- 5–9 in Mount Alford: 1.7% males, 2.7% females; 5–9 in Wallaces Creek: 3.3% males, 0.0% females
- 0–4 in Mount Alford: 1.4% males, 3.8% females; 0–4 in Wallaces Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $500
- First area, 2016: $629
- First area, 2021: $725
- Second area, 2016: $537
- Second area, 2021: $883
- First area, 2011: $987
- First area, 2016: $1,218
- First area, 2021: $1,275
- Second area, 2016: $1,562
- Second area, 2021: $2,312
- First area, 2011: $1,008
- First area, 2016: $1,437
- First area, 2021: $2,023
- Second area, 2016: $1,916
- Second area, 2021: $2,562
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.0
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $157
- First area, 2016: $220
- First area, 2021: $280
- Second area, 2021: $380
- First area, 2011: $1,733
- First area, 2016: $1,625
- First area, 2021: $1,517
- Second area, 2016: $1,549
- Second area, 2021: $2,084
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Mount Alford with nearby areas
Compare Wallaces Creek with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Mount Alford vs Wallaces Creek [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL31934/mount-alford/vs/SAL32961/wallaces-creek