Compare
Cedar Creek vs Mount Samson
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 4.4 km apart · Cedar Creek profile · Mount Samson profile
Cedar Creek Mount Samson
Cedar Creek (Moreton Bay - Qld) and Mount Samson are neighbouring rural-residential areas with similar house sizes and populations. Cedar Creek has a younger feel, with a well higher share of children under 15 (24.1% compared to 18.4%) and a typical resident aged 43, while Mount Samson is noticeably older at 47. Cedar Creek also sees far higher full-time employment (65.9% versus 53.4%) and a typical weekly personal income that is well higher at $1,065, compared to $846 in Mount Samson.
Both areas have tracked similarly since 2011, remaining almost entirely detached housing with identical rental rates of 6.6%. While they are both very similar in their distance to the city and the number of people per home, Mount Samson is much more walkable; it has far more amenities and parks within a 15-minute walk. In contrast, Cedar Creek is more car-dependent, with no schools within 3km and few walkable facilities.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 634
- First area, 2016: 745
- First area, 2021: 831
- Second area, 2011: 566
- Second area, 2016: 594
- Second area, 2021: 625
- First area, 2011: 38 yrs
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 47 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Cedar Creek: 0.6% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Mount Samson: 0.0% males, 0.5% females
- 80–84 in Cedar Creek: 0.5% males, 1.1% females; 80–84 in Mount Samson: 0.5% males, 0.8% females
- 75–79 in Cedar Creek: 1.2% males, 1.2% females; 75–79 in Mount Samson: 1.5% males, 1.3% females
- 70–74 in Cedar Creek: 2.3% males, 1.9% females; 70–74 in Mount Samson: 3.3% males, 3.1% females
- 65–69 in Cedar Creek: 2.3% males, 2.6% females; 65–69 in Mount Samson: 1.8% males, 2.4% females
- 60–64 in Cedar Creek: 3.6% males, 2.7% females; 60–64 in Mount Samson: 3.9% males, 4.7% females
- 55–59 in Cedar Creek: 3.7% males, 3.9% females; 55–59 in Mount Samson: 4.9% males, 5.4% females
- 50–54 in Cedar Creek: 4.3% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in Mount Samson: 5.0% males, 5.5% females
- 45–49 in Cedar Creek: 5.7% males, 5.1% females; 45–49 in Mount Samson: 3.1% males, 4.6% females
- 40–44 in Cedar Creek: 2.9% males, 4.7% females; 40–44 in Mount Samson: 2.9% males, 5.2% females
- 35–39 in Cedar Creek: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 35–39 in Mount Samson: 1.6% males, 2.6% females
- 30–34 in Cedar Creek: 2.2% males, 1.4% females; 30–34 in Mount Samson: 0.5% males, 1.6% females
- 25–29 in Cedar Creek: 2.2% males, 1.4% females; 25–29 in Mount Samson: 1.5% males, 0.5% females
- 20–24 in Cedar Creek: 2.0% males, 2.3% females; 20–24 in Mount Samson: 3.3% males, 2.0% females
- 15–19 in Cedar Creek: 2.9% males, 4.2% females; 15–19 in Mount Samson: 3.3% males, 3.9% females
- 10–14 in Cedar Creek: 5.3% males, 4.9% females; 10–14 in Mount Samson: 4.2% males, 4.6% females
- 5–9 in Cedar Creek: 4.5% males, 3.1% females; 5–9 in Mount Samson: 3.9% males, 2.6% females
- 0–4 in Cedar Creek: 2.5% males, 2.2% females; 0–4 in Mount Samson: 2.1% males, 1.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $744
- First area, 2016: $854
- First area, 2021: $1,065
- Second area, 2011: $709
- Second area, 2016: $775
- Second area, 2021: $846
- First area, 2011: $2,043
- First area, 2016: $2,419
- First area, 2021: $3,250
- Second area, 2011: $2,096
- Second area, 2016: $2,180
- Second area, 2021: $2,750
- First area, 2011: $2,381
- First area, 2016: $2,425
- First area, 2021: $3,261
- Second area, 2011: $2,196
- Second area, 2016: $2,132
- Second area, 2021: $2,708
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.2
- First area, 2016: 3.4
- First area, 2021: 3.3
- Second area, 2011: 3.2
- Second area, 2016: 3.2
- Second area, 2021: 3.1
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $410
- First area, 2016: $425
- First area, 2021: $600
- Second area, 2011: $375
- Second area, 2016: $520
- Second area, 2021: $435
- First area, 2011: $2,947
- First area, 2016: $2,600
- First area, 2021: $2,600
- Second area, 2011: $2,264
- Second area, 2016: $2,250
- Second area, 2021: $2,392
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Cedar Creek with nearby areas
Compare Mount Samson with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Cedar Creek vs Mount Samson [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL30568/cedar-creek/vs/SAL32019/mount-samson