Compare
Calvert vs Rosewood
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 8.8 km apart · Calvert profile · Rosewood profile
Calvert Rosewood
Rosewood (Qld) and Calvert (Qld) are neighbouring areas that offer very different living patterns. Rosewood (Qld) is more developed and accessible, with a walkability score of 4.1 (somewhat walkable), while Calvert (Qld) is car-dependent with a score of 0.2. This is reflected in the home lives of residents: 41.0% of homes in Rosewood (Qld) are rented, compared to just 9.7% in Calvert (Qld). Rosewood (Qld) also has a much larger presence of people living alone, at 28.3% compared to 10.6% in Calvert (Qld).
A gap in regional mobility is widening as Rosewood (Qld) continues to offer more walkable amenities, with 85.3% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a park compared to just 0.3% in Calvert (Qld). Despite these spatial differences, both areas are very similar in other ways. They share nearly identical levels of English proficiency and a similar share of high-income earners who earn $2,000 or more a week. They also have very similar housing types, with roughly 80% of homes in both areas having three or more bedrooms.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 281
- First area, 2016: 313
- First area, 2021: 374
- Second area, 2011: 2,746
- Second area, 2016: 2,834
- Second area, 2021: 3,263
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 45 yrs
- First area, 2021: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 39 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Calvert: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Rosewood: 0.9% males, 1.8% females
- 80–84 in Calvert: 0.8% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Rosewood: 1.4% males, 1.5% females
- 75–79 in Calvert: 0.0% males, 2.4% females; 75–79 in Rosewood: 1.6% males, 2.0% females
- 70–74 in Calvert: 2.9% males, 5.3% females; 70–74 in Rosewood: 2.6% males, 2.9% females
- 65–69 in Calvert: 3.2% males, 1.9% females; 65–69 in Rosewood: 2.5% males, 3.1% females
- 60–64 in Calvert: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 60–64 in Rosewood: 3.6% males, 3.3% females
- 55–59 in Calvert: 4.2% males, 2.9% females; 55–59 in Rosewood: 2.9% males, 3.2% females
- 50–54 in Calvert: 1.9% males, 6.4% females; 50–54 in Rosewood: 2.8% males, 3.1% females
- 45–49 in Calvert: 4.0% males, 3.4% females; 45–49 in Rosewood: 2.2% males, 3.2% females
- 40–44 in Calvert: 1.9% males, 4.2% females; 40–44 in Rosewood: 2.3% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Calvert: 3.4% males, 1.6% females; 35–39 in Rosewood: 2.7% males, 3.1% females
- 30–34 in Calvert: 2.9% males, 3.2% females; 30–34 in Rosewood: 2.5% males, 3.7% females
- 25–29 in Calvert: 3.4% males, 2.4% females; 25–29 in Rosewood: 2.2% males, 3.0% females
- 20–24 in Calvert: 4.0% males, 2.9% females; 20–24 in Rosewood: 3.2% males, 3.5% females
- 15–19 in Calvert: 4.8% males, 3.4% females; 15–19 in Rosewood: 2.9% males, 3.3% females
- 10–14 in Calvert: 2.9% males, 4.2% females; 10–14 in Rosewood: 3.6% males, 3.4% females
- 5–9 in Calvert: 2.4% males, 3.4% females; 5–9 in Rosewood: 3.3% males, 3.8% females
- 0–4 in Calvert: 1.9% males, 2.1% females; 0–4 in Rosewood: 3.3% males, 2.7% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $406
- First area, 2016: $504
- First area, 2021: $785
- Second area, 2011: $499
- Second area, 2016: $514
- Second area, 2021: $636
- First area, 2011: $1,031
- First area, 2016: $1,437
- First area, 2021: $1,765
- Second area, 2011: $1,027
- Second area, 2016: $1,110
- Second area, 2021: $1,233
- First area, 2011: $1,194
- First area, 2016: $1,536
- First area, 2021: $1,843
- Second area, 2011: $1,195
- Second area, 2016: $1,295
- Second area, 2021: $1,473
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $280
- First area, 2016: $255
- First area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2011: $270
- Second area, 2016: $285
- Second area, 2021: $295
- First area, 2011: $1,600
- First area, 2016: $1,539
- First area, 2021: $2,111
- Second area, 2011: $1,450
- Second area, 2016: $1,400
- Second area, 2021: $1,349
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Calvert with nearby areas
Compare Rosewood with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Calvert vs Rosewood [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL30494/calvert/vs/SAL32475/rosewood