Compare
Calvert vs Lanefield
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 4.7 km apart · Calvert profile · Lanefield profile
Calvert Lanefield
Calvert (Qld) and Lanefield are neighbouring areas in Queensland, but they have very different populations. Calvert (Qld) is younger and more family-oriented, with 16.6% of people under 15 and a far higher share of people in de facto relationships. In contrast, Lanefield is sparsely populated and much older, with a typical resident aged 53. Income is also a key difference; the typical weekly household income in Calvert (Qld) is $1,765, which is well higher than the $1,312 seen in Lanefield.
Both areas sit close to the national figure for people with long-term health conditions, with Calvert (Qld) at 27.3% and Lanefield slightly higher at 37.1%. They are also very similar in that no one in either area speaks little or no English, and both have almost no homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries. While Lanefield has far more public transport stops and departures per 1,000 people, it takes residents in Calvert (Qld) far longer to walk to their nearest stop.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 281
- First area, 2016: 313
- First area, 2021: 374
- Second area, 2011: 234
- Second area, 2016: 107
- Second area, 2021: 97
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 45 yrs
- First area, 2021: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 53 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Calvert: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Lanefield: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Calvert: 0.8% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Lanefield: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Calvert: 0.0% males, 2.4% females; 75–79 in Lanefield: 3.5% males, 4.7% females
- 70–74 in Calvert: 2.9% males, 5.3% females; 70–74 in Lanefield: 0.0% males, 4.7% females
- 65–69 in Calvert: 3.2% males, 1.9% females; 65–69 in Lanefield: 3.5% males, 0.0% females
- 60–64 in Calvert: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 60–64 in Lanefield: 3.5% males, 3.5% females
- 55–59 in Calvert: 4.2% males, 2.9% females; 55–59 in Lanefield: 10.6% males, 11.8% females
- 50–54 in Calvert: 1.9% males, 6.4% females; 50–54 in Lanefield: 3.5% males, 5.9% females
- 45–49 in Calvert: 4.0% males, 3.4% females; 45–49 in Lanefield: 0.0% males, 5.9% females
- 40–44 in Calvert: 1.9% males, 4.2% females; 40–44 in Lanefield: 0.0% males, 3.5% females
- 35–39 in Calvert: 3.4% males, 1.6% females; 35–39 in Lanefield: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 30–34 in Calvert: 2.9% males, 3.2% females; 30–34 in Lanefield: 5.9% males, 0.0% females
- 25–29 in Calvert: 3.4% males, 2.4% females; 25–29 in Lanefield: 4.7% males, 0.0% females
- 20–24 in Calvert: 4.0% males, 2.9% females; 20–24 in Lanefield: 4.7% males, 4.7% females
- 15–19 in Calvert: 4.8% males, 3.4% females; 15–19 in Lanefield: 4.7% males, 5.9% females
- 10–14 in Calvert: 2.9% males, 4.2% females; 10–14 in Lanefield: 0.0% males, 4.7% females
- 5–9 in Calvert: 2.4% males, 3.4% females; 5–9 in Lanefield: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 0–4 in Calvert: 1.9% males, 2.1% females; 0–4 in Lanefield: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $406
- First area, 2016: $504
- First area, 2021: $785
- Second area, 2011: $524
- Second area, 2016: $749
- Second area, 2021: $587
- First area, 2011: $1,031
- First area, 2016: $1,437
- First area, 2021: $1,765
- Second area, 2011: $1,083
- Second area, 2016: $1,708
- Second area, 2021: $1,312
- First area, 2011: $1,194
- First area, 2016: $1,536
- First area, 2021: $1,843
- Second area, 2011: $1,375
- Second area, 2016: $1,916
- Second area, 2021: $1,625
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $280
- First area, 2016: $255
- First area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2011: $285
- Second area, 2016: $220
- Second area, 2021: $263
- First area, 2011: $1,600
- First area, 2016: $1,539
- First area, 2021: $2,111
- Second area, 2011: $1,533
- Second area, 2016: $1,759
- Second area, 2021: $1,599
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Calvert with nearby areas
Compare Lanefield with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Calvert vs Lanefield [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL30494/calvert/vs/SAL31632/lanefield