Compare
Bouldercombe vs Mount Morgan
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 12 km apart · Bouldercombe profile · Mount Morgan profile
Bouldercombe Mount Morgan
Mount Morgan and Bouldercombe are two nearby Queensland areas with very different social and economic profiles. Mount Morgan has a much higher rate of unemployment at 16.0% and far more people living alone (43.2%). It is also more walkable, with 64.8% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries. In contrast, Bouldercombe is more affluent, with a typical household income of $1,531 per week compared to $779 in Mount Morgan, and far more large homes, with 78.3% having three or more bedrooms.
Everyday life in both places shares a similar lack of public transport, as neither area has any public transport stops or departures. They also have very similar proportions of people who served in the Defence Force and a similar number of people per bedroom. While Mount Morgan is mostly car-dependent, it is far more walkable than Bouldercombe, which is described as car-dependent.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 1,132
- First area, 2016: 1,085
- First area, 2021: 1,117
- Second area, 2011: 2,115
- Second area, 2016: 1,963
- Second area, 2021: 2,018
- First area, 2011: 43 yrs
- First area, 2016: 44 yrs
- First area, 2021: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 49 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 52 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bouldercombe: 0.3% males, 0.7% females; 85+ in Mount Morgan: 0.8% males, 1.4% females
- 80–84 in Bouldercombe: 1.3% males, 1.3% females; 80–84 in Mount Morgan: 1.9% males, 1.4% females
- 75–79 in Bouldercombe: 1.8% males, 1.8% females; 75–79 in Mount Morgan: 3.1% males, 2.5% females
- 70–74 in Bouldercombe: 2.7% males, 2.3% females; 70–74 in Mount Morgan: 4.2% males, 3.9% females
- 65–69 in Bouldercombe: 4.3% males, 3.6% females; 65–69 in Mount Morgan: 4.9% males, 4.7% females
- 60–64 in Bouldercombe: 4.1% males, 4.7% females; 60–64 in Mount Morgan: 4.9% males, 4.2% females
- 55–59 in Bouldercombe: 5.4% males, 3.8% females; 55–59 in Mount Morgan: 4.5% males, 4.1% females
- 50–54 in Bouldercombe: 2.9% males, 3.9% females; 50–54 in Mount Morgan: 3.5% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Bouldercombe: 3.3% males, 3.5% females; 45–49 in Mount Morgan: 3.2% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Bouldercombe: 3.8% males, 3.0% females; 40–44 in Mount Morgan: 2.4% males, 2.6% females
- 35–39 in Bouldercombe: 3.3% males, 2.6% females; 35–39 in Mount Morgan: 1.5% males, 2.3% females
- 30–34 in Bouldercombe: 3.3% males, 2.1% females; 30–34 in Mount Morgan: 1.3% males, 1.6% females
- 25–29 in Bouldercombe: 1.1% males, 2.1% females; 25–29 in Mount Morgan: 2.5% males, 2.5% females
- 20–24 in Bouldercombe: 1.8% males, 1.4% females; 20–24 in Mount Morgan: 2.4% males, 2.2% females
- 15–19 in Bouldercombe: 2.9% males, 3.0% females; 15–19 in Mount Morgan: 2.0% males, 2.3% females
- 10–14 in Bouldercombe: 2.7% males, 3.9% females; 10–14 in Mount Morgan: 3.1% males, 2.6% females
- 5–9 in Bouldercombe: 3.2% males, 3.7% females; 5–9 in Mount Morgan: 2.2% males, 2.4% females
- 0–4 in Bouldercombe: 2.0% males, 2.6% females; 0–4 in Mount Morgan: 1.9% males, 1.7% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $607
- First area, 2016: $666
- First area, 2021: $686
- Second area, 2011: $361
- Second area, 2016: $437
- Second area, 2021: $462
- First area, 2011: $1,471
- First area, 2016: $1,412
- First area, 2021: $1,531
- Second area, 2011: $600
- Second area, 2016: $742
- Second area, 2021: $779
- First area, 2011: $1,668
- First area, 2016: $1,593
- First area, 2021: $1,737
- Second area, 2011: $778
- Second area, 2016: $895
- Second area, 2021: $1,066
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 2.2
- Second area, 2016: 2.1
- Second area, 2021: 2.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $157
- First area, 2016: $250
- First area, 2021: $310
- Second area, 2011: $155
- Second area, 2016: $175
- Second area, 2021: $200
- First area, 2011: $1,658
- First area, 2016: $1,701
- First area, 2021: $1,517
- Second area, 2011: $867
- Second area, 2016: $867
- Second area, 2021: $758
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bouldercombe with nearby areas
Compare Mount Morgan with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bouldercombe vs Mount Morgan [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL30339/bouldercombe/vs/SAL32001/mount-morgan