Compare
Beach Holm vs Mount Low
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 3.7 km apart · Beach Holm profile · Mount Low profile
Beach Holm Mount Low
Mount Low and Beach Holm are neighbouring areas in Queensland with very different profiles. Mount Low is a larger, younger community where the typical resident is 29 and 28.5% of the population are children. It is more affluent, with a typical weekly household income of $2,259, and a workforce where 76.5% of adults are working or looking for work. In contrast, Beach Holm is sparsely populated and much older; the typical resident is 53, and 22.9% are seniors. Weekly household incomes there are much lower at $899, and 40% of people live with a long-term health condition.
Both areas are effectively alike in their low rates of people who speak little or no English and a similar share of volunteers. This shared stability exists despite a wide gap in how the two places are built. Mount Low has far more street intersections and public transport options, while Beach Holm is much more car-dependent. This contrast is also seen in the housing, where typical weekly rents in Mount Low are far higher at $370 compared to $180 in Beach Holm.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 19
- First area, 2016: 32
- First area, 2021: 35
- Second area, 2011: 2,391
- Second area, 2016: 4,655
- Second area, 2021: 5,488
- First area, 2011: 58 yrs
- First area, 2016: 63 yrs
- First area, 2021: 53 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 30 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 28 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 29 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Beach Holm: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Mount Low: 0.1% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Beach Holm: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Mount Low: 0.3% males, 0.1% females
- 75–79 in Beach Holm: 8.1% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Mount Low: 0.5% males, 0.5% females
- 70–74 in Beach Holm: 0.0% males, 8.1% females; 70–74 in Mount Low: 1.0% males, 0.9% females
- 65–69 in Beach Holm: 10.8% males, 0.0% females; 65–69 in Mount Low: 1.1% males, 1.4% females
- 60–64 in Beach Holm: 13.5% males, 0.0% females; 60–64 in Mount Low: 1.7% males, 1.4% females
- 55–59 in Beach Holm: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 55–59 in Mount Low: 2.1% males, 2.1% females
- 50–54 in Beach Holm: 0.0% males, 8.1% females; 50–54 in Mount Low: 2.2% males, 2.3% females
- 45–49 in Beach Holm: 0.0% males, 8.1% females; 45–49 in Mount Low: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 40–44 in Beach Holm: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 40–44 in Mount Low: 3.2% males, 3.6% females
- 35–39 in Beach Holm: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 35–39 in Mount Low: 4.6% males, 4.9% females
- 30–34 in Beach Holm: 0.0% males, 8.1% females; 30–34 in Mount Low: 4.8% males, 5.5% females
- 25–29 in Beach Holm: 8.1% males, 10.8% females; 25–29 in Mount Low: 4.4% males, 4.9% females
- 20–24 in Beach Holm: 8.1% males, 8.1% females; 20–24 in Mount Low: 3.5% males, 3.5% females
- 15–19 in Beach Holm: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 15–19 in Mount Low: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Beach Holm: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 10–14 in Mount Low: 4.3% males, 4.0% females
- 5–9 in Beach Holm: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 5–9 in Mount Low: 5.4% males, 4.6% females
- 0–4 in Beach Holm: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 0–4 in Mount Low: 5.3% males, 5.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $370
- First area, 2016: $474
- First area, 2021: $725
- Second area, 2011: $808
- Second area, 2016: $840
- Second area, 2021: $1,052
- First area, 2011: $820
- First area, 2016: $725
- First area, 2021: $899
- Second area, 2011: $1,913
- Second area, 2016: $1,869
- Second area, 2021: $2,259
- First area, 2011: $900
- First area, 2016: $1,499
- First area, 2021: $1,875
- Second area, 2011: $1,932
- Second area, 2016: $1,926
- Second area, 2021: $2,353
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 1.3
- First area, 2016: 1.4
- First area, 2021: 1.7
- Second area, 2011: 3.2
- Second area, 2016: 3.0
- Second area, 2021: 3.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2021: $180
- Second area, 2011: $350
- Second area, 2016: $330
- Second area, 2021: $370
- First area, 2011: $1,820
- Second area, 2011: $2,167
- Second area, 2016: $2,058
- Second area, 2021: $1,733
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Beach Holm with nearby areas
Compare Mount Low with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Beach Holm vs Mount Low [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL30189/beach-holm/vs/SAL31986/mount-low