Compare
Linga vs Tutye
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 19 km apart · Linga profile · Tutye profile
Linga Tutye
Tutye and Linga are both sparsely populated areas in Victoria. Tutye has a typical weekly family income of $1,874, which is well higher than the $1,187 usually seen in Linga. Residents in Tutye are also noticeably older, with a typical age of 60 compared to 57 in Linga. Tutye has more public transport options, including one stop and one route, while Linga has none.
Both areas are car-dependent and share very similar typical household incomes of around $1,200. This reliance on cars is consistent across both locations, as neither has any homes within a 15-minute walk of a school, groceries, or health services. While Tutye is far older than the national figure, Linga follows a similar pattern, with its residents also being far older than the typical Australian.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 10
- First area, 2021: 13
- Second area, 2016: 20
- Second area, 2021: 21
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Linga: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Tutye: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Linga: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Tutye: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Linga: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Tutye: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Linga: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 70–74 in Tutye: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 65–69 in Linga: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 65–69 in Tutye: 22.2% males, 0.0% females
- 60–64 in Linga: 0.0% males, 100.0% females; 60–64 in Tutye: 27.8% males, 0.0% females
- 55–59 in Linga: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 55–59 in Tutye: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 50–54 in Linga: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 50–54 in Tutye: 27.8% males, 22.2% females
- 45–49 in Linga: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 45–49 in Tutye: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 40–44 in Linga: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 40–44 in Tutye: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 35–39 in Linga: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 35–39 in Tutye: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 30–34 in Linga: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 30–34 in Tutye: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 25–29 in Linga: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 25–29 in Tutye: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 20–24 in Linga: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 20–24 in Tutye: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Linga: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 15–19 in Tutye: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 10–14 in Linga: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 10–14 in Tutye: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 5–9 in Linga: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 5–9 in Tutye: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 0–4 in Linga: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 0–4 in Tutye: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $825
- First area, 2021: $575
- Second area, 2016: $262
- Second area, 2021: $687
- First area, 2016: $1,124
- First area, 2021: $1,187
- Second area, 2016: $225
- Second area, 2021: $1,249
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
Family composition
Housing & Dwellings
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Linga with nearby areas
Compare Tutye with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Linga vs Tutye [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL21513/linga/vs/SAL22592/tutye