Compare
Boinka vs Linga
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 9.4 km apart · Boinka profile · Linga profile
Boinka Linga
Boinka and Linga are both sparsely populated, non-residential areas in Victoria. Boinka has a far higher typical family and household income at $3,999 per week, while Linga is much lower at $1,187. In contrast, personal income is far higher in Linga at $575 compared to $350 in Boinka. Boinka also has more public transport options, with one route and one stop, while Linga has none.
Both areas are car-dependent and have no homes within a 15-minute walk of schools, groceries, or health services. They share very similar terrain and the same number of people per bedroom. However, the gaps between them are shifting, with residents now noticeably older in Linga, where the typical age is 57 compared to 54 in Boinka.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 13
- First area, 2021: 14
- Second area, 2016: 10
- Second area, 2021: 13
Age structure
Marital status
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $449
- First area, 2021: $350
- Second area, 2016: $825
- Second area, 2021: $575
- First area, 2016: $1,749
- First area, 2021: $3,999
- Second area, 2016: $1,124
- Second area, 2021: $1,187
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
First Nations
Family & Households
Family composition
Housing & Dwellings
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Boinka with nearby areas
Compare Linga with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Boinka vs Linga [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL20269/boinka/vs/SAL21513/linga