Compare
Glenburn vs Kinglake
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 12 km apart · Glenburn profile · Kinglake profile
Glenburn Kinglake
Kinglake and Glenburn are two nearby Victorian areas with distinct living patterns. Kinglake is more developed, with more adults working or looking for work (63.9% compared to 52.7% in Glenburn) and more residents with a bachelor degree or higher. It is also more walkable; 31.4% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries, while that figure is 0.0% for Glenburn. In contrast, Glenburn has a much older population, with 23.5% of residents aged 65 and over compared to 13.1% in Kinglake, and a far higher share of homes owned outright at 45.0%.
These two areas share a very similar housing and household profile, with almost identical typical weekly incomes, rent, and average home sizes. They also both have about the same share of volunteers and people born overseas. While they are similar in these ways, their walkability differs; Kinglake is mostly car-dependent, which is still far higher than Glenburn, which is simply car-dependent.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 360
- First area, 2016: 415
- First area, 2021: 443
- Second area, 2011: 1,347
- Second area, 2016: 1,536
- Second area, 2021: 1,662
- First area, 2011: 49 yrs
- First area, 2016: 49 yrs
- First area, 2021: 50 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 43 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Glenburn: 1.1% males, 1.1% females; 85+ in Kinglake: 0.2% males, 0.5% females
- 80–84 in Glenburn: 0.0% males, 1.1% females; 80–84 in Kinglake: 0.3% males, 0.5% females
- 75–79 in Glenburn: 3.1% males, 2.2% females; 75–79 in Kinglake: 1.4% males, 1.0% females
- 70–74 in Glenburn: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 70–74 in Kinglake: 1.9% males, 2.3% females
- 65–69 in Glenburn: 3.4% males, 5.2% females; 65–69 in Kinglake: 3.3% males, 2.5% females
- 60–64 in Glenburn: 4.7% males, 4.0% females; 60–64 in Kinglake: 4.2% males, 3.6% females
- 55–59 in Glenburn: 4.0% males, 3.8% females; 55–59 in Kinglake: 4.0% males, 3.7% females
- 50–54 in Glenburn: 4.7% males, 3.6% females; 50–54 in Kinglake: 4.5% males, 4.4% females
- 45–49 in Glenburn: 3.4% males, 4.3% females; 45–49 in Kinglake: 4.3% males, 4.2% females
- 40–44 in Glenburn: 2.9% males, 3.6% females; 40–44 in Kinglake: 3.8% males, 3.5% females
- 35–39 in Glenburn: 1.3% males, 1.1% females; 35–39 in Kinglake: 3.0% males, 3.2% females
- 30–34 in Glenburn: 1.8% males, 2.0% females; 30–34 in Kinglake: 3.6% males, 3.0% females
- 25–29 in Glenburn: 2.5% males, 0.9% females; 25–29 in Kinglake: 2.1% males, 2.4% females
- 20–24 in Glenburn: 2.2% males, 2.2% females; 20–24 in Kinglake: 2.8% males, 2.3% females
- 15–19 in Glenburn: 3.6% males, 3.6% females; 15–19 in Kinglake: 3.5% males, 2.8% females
- 10–14 in Glenburn: 2.9% males, 2.9% females; 10–14 in Kinglake: 3.4% males, 3.3% females
- 5–9 in Glenburn: 1.1% males, 3.1% females; 5–9 in Kinglake: 3.2% males, 2.5% females
- 0–4 in Glenburn: 2.7% males, 3.1% females; 0–4 in Kinglake: 2.9% males, 2.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $486
- First area, 2016: $595
- First area, 2021: $696
- Second area, 2011: $537
- Second area, 2016: $638
- Second area, 2021: $788
- First area, 2011: $860
- First area, 2016: $1,231
- First area, 2021: $1,696
- Second area, 2011: $1,165
- Second area, 2016: $1,353
- Second area, 2021: $1,737
- First area, 2011: $1,350
- First area, 2016: $1,421
- First area, 2021: $1,854
- Second area, 2011: $1,276
- Second area, 2016: $1,638
- Second area, 2021: $2,085
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.2
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $215
- First area, 2016: $220
- First area, 2021: $320
- Second area, 2011: $113
- Second area, 2016: $285
- Second area, 2021: $300
- First area, 2011: $1,733
- First area, 2016: $1,509
- First area, 2021: $2,050
- Second area, 2011: $1,546
- Second area, 2016: $1,500
- Second area, 2021: $1,733
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Glenburn with nearby areas
Compare Kinglake with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Glenburn vs Kinglake [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL21020/glenburn/vs/SAL21358/kinglake