Compare
Dixons Creek vs Kinglake
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 12 km apart · Dixons Creek profile · Kinglake profile
Dixons Creek Kinglake
Kinglake and Dixons Creek are nearby Victorian areas with very different profiles. Kinglake is younger and more accessible, with a typical resident aged 43 compared to 54 in Dixons Creek. This difference is clear in the age structure, as the share of seniors is far higher in Dixons Creek (28.8% vs 13.1%). Kinglake also has more amenities within walking distance, including groceries and public transport, while 53.4% of homes in Dixons Creek are owned outright, far higher than the 34.4% in Kinglake.
Typical weekly personal incomes are almost identical in both places, sitting around $790. This shared financial baseline exists even as other trends diverge. For example, Dixons Creek has a higher share of adults with bachelor degrees (24.4% vs 15.2%) and more people born overseas. Meanwhile, Kinglake has a much higher share of people with no religion (60.4% vs 49.7%) and a higher proportion of children under 15.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 336
- First area, 2016: 334
- First area, 2021: 344
- Second area, 2011: 1,347
- Second area, 2016: 1,536
- Second area, 2021: 1,662
- First area, 2011: 46 yrs
- First area, 2016: 50 yrs
- First area, 2021: 54 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 43 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Dixons Creek: 1.2% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Kinglake: 0.2% males, 0.5% females
- 80–84 in Dixons Creek: 0.9% males, 1.2% females; 80–84 in Kinglake: 0.3% males, 0.5% females
- 75–79 in Dixons Creek: 2.4% males, 4.4% females; 75–79 in Kinglake: 1.4% males, 1.0% females
- 70–74 in Dixons Creek: 6.2% males, 5.0% females; 70–74 in Kinglake: 1.9% males, 2.3% females
- 65–69 in Dixons Creek: 4.1% males, 2.6% females; 65–69 in Kinglake: 3.3% males, 2.5% females
- 60–64 in Dixons Creek: 4.4% males, 4.7% females; 60–64 in Kinglake: 4.2% males, 3.6% females
- 55–59 in Dixons Creek: 6.8% males, 5.0% females; 55–59 in Kinglake: 4.0% males, 3.7% females
- 50–54 in Dixons Creek: 1.8% males, 4.7% females; 50–54 in Kinglake: 4.5% males, 4.4% females
- 45–49 in Dixons Creek: 1.8% males, 1.5% females; 45–49 in Kinglake: 4.3% males, 4.2% females
- 40–44 in Dixons Creek: 1.5% males, 2.1% females; 40–44 in Kinglake: 3.8% males, 3.5% females
- 35–39 in Dixons Creek: 1.8% males, 2.4% females; 35–39 in Kinglake: 3.0% males, 3.2% females
- 30–34 in Dixons Creek: 2.9% males, 2.9% females; 30–34 in Kinglake: 3.6% males, 3.0% females
- 25–29 in Dixons Creek: 1.8% males, 1.2% females; 25–29 in Kinglake: 2.1% males, 2.4% females
- 20–24 in Dixons Creek: 4.1% males, 2.9% females; 20–24 in Kinglake: 2.8% males, 2.3% females
- 15–19 in Dixons Creek: 3.2% males, 3.2% females; 15–19 in Kinglake: 3.5% males, 2.8% females
- 10–14 in Dixons Creek: 1.5% males, 1.5% females; 10–14 in Kinglake: 3.4% males, 3.3% females
- 5–9 in Dixons Creek: 3.2% males, 2.1% females; 5–9 in Kinglake: 3.2% males, 2.5% females
- 0–4 in Dixons Creek: 1.8% males, 1.5% females; 0–4 in Kinglake: 2.9% males, 2.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $586
- First area, 2016: $622
- First area, 2021: $790
- Second area, 2011: $537
- Second area, 2016: $638
- Second area, 2021: $788
- First area, 2011: $1,199
- First area, 2016: $1,397
- First area, 2021: $2,016
- Second area, 2011: $1,165
- Second area, 2016: $1,353
- Second area, 2021: $1,737
- First area, 2011: $1,416
- First area, 2016: $1,708
- First area, 2021: $2,111
- Second area, 2011: $1,276
- Second area, 2016: $1,638
- Second area, 2021: $2,085
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $113
- First area, 2016: $210
- First area, 2021: $330
- Second area, 2011: $113
- Second area, 2016: $285
- Second area, 2021: $300
- First area, 2011: $1,800
- First area, 2016: $1,733
- First area, 2021: $2,166
- Second area, 2011: $1,546
- Second area, 2016: $1,500
- Second area, 2021: $1,733
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Dixons Creek with nearby areas
Compare Kinglake with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Dixons Creek vs Kinglake [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL20762/dixons-creek/vs/SAL21358/kinglake