Compare
Calulu vs Lindenow
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 4.7 km apart · Calulu profile · Lindenow profile
Calulu Lindenow
Lindenow and Calulu are neighbouring rural areas in East Gippsland with very different layouts. Lindenow is more developed for pedestrians, with a walkability score of 3.5 (mostly car-dependent) and 78.9% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries. In contrast, Calulu is car-dependent, with 0.0% of homes near groceries. There are also notable social differences; Lindenow has a far higher share of people born overseas (18.0%) and those who use another language at home (11.8%), while Calulu has 0.0% for both. Calulu has a much higher share of people caring for children unpaid (37.4%) compared to Lindenow (22.6%).
Since 2011, these two areas have tracked similarly in several ways. Both are made up entirely of separate houses and have no residents commuting by public transport. They also share a similar housing style, with around 84% of homes containing three or more bedrooms. While Lindenow is more walkable, both areas sit well below the national figure for the share of adults with a bachelor degree or higher.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 336
- First area, 2016: 181
- First area, 2021: 186
- Second area, 2011: 390
- Second area, 2016: 449
- Second area, 2021: 527
- First area, 2011: 44 yrs
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 43 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Calulu: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Lindenow: 1.0% males, 0.8% females
- 80–84 in Calulu: 2.7% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Lindenow: 1.4% males, 2.5% females
- 75–79 in Calulu: 4.8% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Lindenow: 1.4% males, 1.4% females
- 70–74 in Calulu: 4.8% males, 6.5% females; 70–74 in Lindenow: 3.9% males, 3.3% females
- 65–69 in Calulu: 0.0% males, 2.2% females; 65–69 in Lindenow: 2.7% males, 5.3% females
- 60–64 in Calulu: 6.5% males, 4.3% females; 60–64 in Lindenow: 2.9% males, 3.7% females
- 55–59 in Calulu: 5.9% males, 2.7% females; 55–59 in Lindenow: 4.3% males, 3.5% females
- 50–54 in Calulu: 0.0% males, 4.3% females; 50–54 in Lindenow: 2.3% males, 2.5% females
- 45–49 in Calulu: 5.9% males, 1.6% females; 45–49 in Lindenow: 3.1% males, 2.7% females
- 40–44 in Calulu: 3.2% males, 4.8% females; 40–44 in Lindenow: 2.3% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Calulu: 2.2% males, 3.8% females; 35–39 in Lindenow: 4.5% males, 2.9% females
- 30–34 in Calulu: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 30–34 in Lindenow: 3.9% males, 3.1% females
- 25–29 in Calulu: 2.7% males, 0.0% females; 25–29 in Lindenow: 5.9% males, 1.8% females
- 20–24 in Calulu: 1.6% males, 0.0% females; 20–24 in Lindenow: 2.5% males, 2.0% females
- 15–19 in Calulu: 1.6% males, 1.6% females; 15–19 in Lindenow: 2.0% males, 1.4% females
- 10–14 in Calulu: 6.5% males, 7.5% females; 10–14 in Lindenow: 2.0% males, 1.8% females
- 5–9 in Calulu: 3.2% males, 4.3% females; 5–9 in Lindenow: 4.1% males, 2.9% females
- 0–4 in Calulu: 0.0% males, 4.8% females; 0–4 in Lindenow: 2.2% males, 3.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $477
- First area, 2016: $550
- First area, 2021: $762
- Second area, 2011: $472
- Second area, 2016: $582
- Second area, 2021: $702
- First area, 2011: $921
- First area, 2016: $1,350
- First area, 2021: $1,812
- Second area, 2011: $924
- Second area, 2016: $1,111
- Second area, 2021: $1,292
- First area, 2011: $1,009
- First area, 2016: $1,625
- First area, 2021: $2,028
- Second area, 2011: $1,062
- Second area, 2016: $1,330
- Second area, 2021: $1,449
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 3.0
- First area, 2021: 2.9
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $120
- First area, 2016: $240
- First area, 2021: $263
- Second area, 2011: $210
- Second area, 2016: $220
- Second area, 2021: $260
- First area, 2011: $937
- First area, 2016: $1,441
- First area, 2021: $1,613
- Second area, 2011: $1,192
- Second area, 2016: $1,296
- Second area, 2021: $1,149
- First area, 2011: 1.20
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Calulu with nearby areas
Compare Lindenow with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Calulu vs Lindenow [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL20451/calulu/vs/SAL21509/lindenow