Compare
Rose Bay vs Tamarama
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.8 km apart · Rose Bay profile · Tamarama profile
Rose Bay Tamarama
Rose Bay (NSW) and Tamarama are neighbouring coastal areas with very high typical incomes, though Tamarama is notably wealthier. Tamarama has a typical weekly household income of $4,522, which is far higher than the $2,539 seen in Rose Bay (NSW). There are also stark differences in their populations; Rose Bay (NSW) is noticeably older, with 20.3% of residents aged 65 and over compared to just 9.3% in Tamarama. Additionally, Tamarama is far more secular, with 50.7% of people reporting no religion, while in Rose Bay (NSW) this figure is 28.8%.
Everyday life in both places shares many similarities, from a similar share of children under 15 to almost identical school advantage scores. Both areas are also completely walkable, with every home within a 10-minute walk of public transport. While Rose Bay (NSW) has far more public transport departures and walkable amenities per person, both maintain a similar profile in terms of unemployment and the size of their homes.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 9,401
- First area, 2016: 10,053
- First area, 2021: 9,911
- Second area, 2011: 1,450
- Second area, 2016: 1,622
- Second area, 2021: 1,478
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 38 yrs
- First area, 2021: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 36 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Rose Bay: 1.5% males, 2.2% females; 85+ in Tamarama: 0.0% males, 0.3% females
- 80–84 in Rose Bay: 1.3% males, 1.7% females; 80–84 in Tamarama: 0.5% males, 0.2% females
- 75–79 in Rose Bay: 1.8% males, 2.4% females; 75–79 in Tamarama: 0.8% males, 1.1% females
- 70–74 in Rose Bay: 2.3% males, 2.8% females; 70–74 in Tamarama: 1.6% males, 1.4% females
- 65–69 in Rose Bay: 1.9% males, 2.4% females; 65–69 in Tamarama: 1.5% males, 1.3% females
- 60–64 in Rose Bay: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 60–64 in Tamarama: 2.5% males, 2.1% females
- 55–59 in Rose Bay: 2.7% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Tamarama: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 50–54 in Rose Bay: 2.8% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in Tamarama: 4.4% males, 4.4% females
- 45–49 in Rose Bay: 3.4% males, 3.9% females; 45–49 in Tamarama: 3.1% males, 2.7% females
- 40–44 in Rose Bay: 3.2% males, 3.5% females; 40–44 in Tamarama: 4.0% males, 3.3% females
- 35–39 in Rose Bay: 3.7% males, 4.2% females; 35–39 in Tamarama: 5.8% males, 5.6% females
- 30–34 in Rose Bay: 3.7% males, 4.4% females; 30–34 in Tamarama: 5.9% males, 5.3% females
- 25–29 in Rose Bay: 2.9% males, 3.4% females; 25–29 in Tamarama: 4.7% males, 5.8% females
- 20–24 in Rose Bay: 2.3% males, 3.0% females; 20–24 in Tamarama: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 15–19 in Rose Bay: 2.4% males, 2.5% females; 15–19 in Tamarama: 2.1% males, 2.6% females
- 10–14 in Rose Bay: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 10–14 in Tamarama: 1.8% males, 1.8% females
- 5–9 in Rose Bay: 2.6% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Tamarama: 2.5% males, 2.0% females
- 0–4 in Rose Bay: 2.5% males, 2.6% females; 0–4 in Tamarama: 4.6% males, 2.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $962
- First area, 2016: $1,154
- First area, 2021: $1,398
- Second area, 2011: $1,308
- Second area, 2016: $1,414
- Second area, 2021: $1,788
- First area, 2011: $1,908
- First area, 2016: $2,272
- First area, 2021: $2,539
- Second area, 2011: $2,666
- Second area, 2016: $3,348
- Second area, 2021: $4,522
- First area, 2011: $2,514
- First area, 2016: $2,942
- First area, 2021: $3,510
- Second area, 2011: $2,856
- Second area, 2016: $3,713
- Second area, 2021: $4,771
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $500
- First area, 2016: $600
- First area, 2021: $630
- Second area, 2011: $630
- Second area, 2016: $710
- Second area, 2021: $850
- First area, 2011: $2,877
- First area, 2016: $3,000
- First area, 2021: $3,250
- Second area, 2011: $3,500
- Second area, 2016: $3,640
- Second area, 2021: $4,109
- First area, 2011: 1.20
- First area, 2016: 1.00
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 1.00
- Second area, 2021: 1.00
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Rose Bay with nearby areas
Compare Tamarama with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Rose Bay vs Tamarama [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL13412/rose-bay/vs/SAL13757/tamarama