Compare
Bronte vs Tamarama
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 0.8 km apart · Bronte profile · Tamarama profile
Bronte Tamarama
Bronte and Tamarama are neighbouring coastal areas with very high incomes and qualifications. Tamarama is wealthier, with a typical weekly household income of $4,522 compared to $3,365 in Bronte, and a higher share of adults with a bachelor degree or higher (58.9% versus 52.8%). Bronte is more accessible by public transport, with 29 stops and far more weekly departures per 1,000 people than Tamarama. Bronte also has a slightly older population, with people aged 65 and over making up 13.9% of residents compared to 9.3% in Tamarama.
Both areas have tracked similarly since 2011, maintaining their status as high-earning pockets of Sydney. They are effectively alike in several ways, including the number of people per home (2.5) and the share of residents who use another language at home. While both are far above the national figure for typical weekly rent, it is well higher in Tamarama at $850 compared to $675 in Bronte.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 6,827
- First area, 2016: 6,733
- First area, 2021: 7,166
- Second area, 2011: 1,450
- Second area, 2016: 1,622
- Second area, 2021: 1,478
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 37 yrs
- First area, 2021: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 36 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bronte: 1.0% males, 1.7% females; 85+ in Tamarama: 0.0% males, 0.3% females
- 80–84 in Bronte: 0.8% males, 1.0% females; 80–84 in Tamarama: 0.5% males, 0.2% females
- 75–79 in Bronte: 1.1% males, 1.2% females; 75–79 in Tamarama: 0.8% males, 1.1% females
- 70–74 in Bronte: 1.7% males, 1.8% females; 70–74 in Tamarama: 1.6% males, 1.4% females
- 65–69 in Bronte: 1.7% males, 1.9% females; 65–69 in Tamarama: 1.5% males, 1.3% females
- 60–64 in Bronte: 2.5% males, 2.3% females; 60–64 in Tamarama: 2.5% males, 2.1% females
- 55–59 in Bronte: 3.5% males, 3.1% females; 55–59 in Tamarama: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 50–54 in Bronte: 3.7% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Tamarama: 4.4% males, 4.4% females
- 45–49 in Bronte: 3.8% males, 4.2% females; 45–49 in Tamarama: 3.1% males, 2.7% females
- 40–44 in Bronte: 3.5% males, 3.9% females; 40–44 in Tamarama: 4.0% males, 3.3% females
- 35–39 in Bronte: 3.6% males, 3.8% females; 35–39 in Tamarama: 5.8% males, 5.6% females
- 30–34 in Bronte: 4.1% males, 4.9% females; 30–34 in Tamarama: 5.9% males, 5.3% females
- 25–29 in Bronte: 3.6% males, 3.9% females; 25–29 in Tamarama: 4.7% males, 5.8% females
- 20–24 in Bronte: 2.1% males, 2.3% females; 20–24 in Tamarama: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 15–19 in Bronte: 2.8% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Tamarama: 2.1% males, 2.6% females
- 10–14 in Bronte: 3.7% males, 3.4% females; 10–14 in Tamarama: 1.8% males, 1.8% females
- 5–9 in Bronte: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 5–9 in Tamarama: 2.5% males, 2.0% females
- 0–4 in Bronte: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 0–4 in Tamarama: 4.6% males, 2.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $1,069
- First area, 2016: $1,261
- First area, 2021: $1,562
- Second area, 2011: $1,308
- Second area, 2016: $1,414
- Second area, 2021: $1,788
- First area, 2011: $2,318
- First area, 2016: $2,671
- First area, 2021: $3,365
- Second area, 2011: $2,666
- Second area, 2016: $3,348
- Second area, 2021: $4,522
- First area, 2011: $2,703
- First area, 2016: $3,397
- First area, 2021: $4,501
- Second area, 2011: $2,856
- Second area, 2016: $3,713
- Second area, 2021: $4,771
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $495
- First area, 2016: $620
- First area, 2021: $675
- Second area, 2011: $630
- Second area, 2016: $710
- Second area, 2021: $850
- First area, 2011: $3,467
- First area, 2016: $3,500
- First area, 2021: $3,975
- Second area, 2011: $3,500
- Second area, 2016: $3,640
- Second area, 2021: $4,109
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 1.00
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 1.00
- Second area, 2021: 1.00
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bronte with nearby areas
Compare Tamarama with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bronte vs Tamarama [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10591/bronte/vs/SAL13757/tamarama