Compare
Clovelly vs Tamarama
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 1.6 km apart · Clovelly profile · Tamarama profile
Clovelly Tamarama
Clovelly and Tamarama are neighbouring coastal areas with very high incomes, though they differ in their transport and family profiles. Clovelly is much better connected for commuters, with 3,151 weekly public transport departures per 1,000 people compared to 897 in Tamarama. Clovelly also has a larger share of children under 15 (20.0% versus 15.8%) and more people caring for children unpaid. In contrast, Tamarama has a higher typical weekly household income of $4,522, which is well higher than the $3,474 seen in Clovelly.
Since 2011, both areas have tracked similarly as high-earning hubs where working from home is common. They share a similar social makeup, with about half of residents in both areas reporting no religion and both having roughly the same number of people per home. While both sit far above the national figure for typical income, Tamarama has a higher share of renters and a larger proportion of people born overseas.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 4,581
- First area, 2016: 4,736
- First area, 2021: 4,887
- Second area, 2011: 1,450
- Second area, 2016: 1,622
- Second area, 2021: 1,478
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 37 yrs
- First area, 2021: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 36 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Clovelly: 0.4% males, 0.5% females; 85+ in Tamarama: 0.0% males, 0.3% females
- 80–84 in Clovelly: 0.8% males, 0.6% females; 80–84 in Tamarama: 0.5% males, 0.2% females
- 75–79 in Clovelly: 1.0% males, 1.0% females; 75–79 in Tamarama: 0.8% males, 1.1% females
- 70–74 in Clovelly: 1.7% males, 1.7% females; 70–74 in Tamarama: 1.6% males, 1.4% females
- 65–69 in Clovelly: 2.0% males, 2.3% females; 65–69 in Tamarama: 1.5% males, 1.3% females
- 60–64 in Clovelly: 2.8% males, 2.6% females; 60–64 in Tamarama: 2.5% males, 2.1% females
- 55–59 in Clovelly: 2.5% males, 3.1% females; 55–59 in Tamarama: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 50–54 in Clovelly: 3.5% males, 3.8% females; 50–54 in Tamarama: 4.4% males, 4.4% females
- 45–49 in Clovelly: 4.1% males, 4.1% females; 45–49 in Tamarama: 3.1% males, 2.7% females
- 40–44 in Clovelly: 3.6% males, 4.3% females; 40–44 in Tamarama: 4.0% males, 3.3% females
- 35–39 in Clovelly: 4.0% males, 4.1% females; 35–39 in Tamarama: 5.8% males, 5.6% females
- 30–34 in Clovelly: 4.2% males, 4.6% females; 30–34 in Tamarama: 5.9% males, 5.3% females
- 25–29 in Clovelly: 3.3% males, 4.6% females; 25–29 in Tamarama: 4.7% males, 5.8% females
- 20–24 in Clovelly: 2.1% males, 2.2% females; 20–24 in Tamarama: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 15–19 in Clovelly: 2.5% males, 2.4% females; 15–19 in Tamarama: 2.1% males, 2.6% females
- 10–14 in Clovelly: 3.2% males, 3.6% females; 10–14 in Tamarama: 1.8% males, 1.8% females
- 5–9 in Clovelly: 3.9% males, 3.0% females; 5–9 in Tamarama: 2.5% males, 2.0% females
- 0–4 in Clovelly: 3.3% males, 2.8% females; 0–4 in Tamarama: 4.6% males, 2.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $1,131
- First area, 2016: $1,293
- First area, 2021: $1,633
- Second area, 2011: $1,308
- Second area, 2016: $1,414
- Second area, 2021: $1,788
- First area, 2011: $2,529
- First area, 2016: $2,768
- First area, 2021: $3,474
- Second area, 2011: $2,666
- Second area, 2016: $3,348
- Second area, 2021: $4,522
- First area, 2011: $2,810
- First area, 2016: $3,416
- First area, 2021: $4,236
- Second area, 2011: $2,856
- Second area, 2016: $3,713
- Second area, 2021: $4,771
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $520
- First area, 2016: $630
- First area, 2021: $700
- Second area, 2011: $630
- Second area, 2016: $710
- Second area, 2021: $850
- First area, 2011: $3,067
- First area, 2016: $3,683
- First area, 2021: $4,333
- Second area, 2011: $3,500
- Second area, 2016: $3,640
- Second area, 2021: $4,109
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 1.00
- First area, 2021: 1.00
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 1.00
- Second area, 2021: 1.00
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Clovelly with nearby areas
Compare Tamarama with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Clovelly vs Tamarama [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10937/clovelly/vs/SAL13757/tamarama