Compare
Belmore vs Kingsgrove
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.5 km apart · Belmore profile · Kingsgrove profile
Belmore Kingsgrove
Belmore and Kingsgrove are neighbouring suburbs with distinct housing and financial profiles. Kingsgrove has a much higher share of separate houses (82.0% compared to 43.8% in Belmore) and far more homes with three or more bedrooms. This is consistent with a wealthier profile; the typical weekly household income in Kingsgrove is $1,898, which is well higher than the $1,456 seen in Belmore. Belmore is more heavily defined by renters, who make up 43.0% of households, and has a far higher share of people who speak a First Nations language (21.1% versus 7.5% in Kingsgrove).
Both areas sit close to the national figure for the typical age of residents, with Belmore at 38 and Kingsgrove at 42. They share a similar level of diversity, as both are among the highest in the country for the share of people born overseas. While Kingsgrove has far more public transport departures and more people who own their homes outright, both suburbs are very walkable, with nearly every home within a 15-minute walk of a park or school.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 12,574
- First area, 2016: 12,718
- First area, 2021: 13,781
- Second area, 2011: 11,516
- Second area, 2016: 12,446
- Second area, 2021: 12,881
- First area, 2011: 35 yrs
- First area, 2016: 37 yrs
- First area, 2021: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 42 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Belmore: 1.0% males, 1.5% females; 85+ in Kingsgrove: 1.4% males, 1.8% females
- 80–84 in Belmore: 1.3% males, 1.4% females; 80–84 in Kingsgrove: 1.3% males, 1.5% females
- 75–79 in Belmore: 1.4% males, 1.6% females; 75–79 in Kingsgrove: 1.8% males, 2.0% females
- 70–74 in Belmore: 1.9% males, 2.2% females; 70–74 in Kingsgrove: 2.2% males, 2.6% females
- 65–69 in Belmore: 2.1% males, 2.3% females; 65–69 in Kingsgrove: 2.3% males, 3.0% females
- 60–64 in Belmore: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 60–64 in Kingsgrove: 2.3% males, 3.3% females
- 55–59 in Belmore: 3.0% males, 3.1% females; 55–59 in Kingsgrove: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 50–54 in Belmore: 3.4% males, 3.2% females; 50–54 in Kingsgrove: 3.3% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Belmore: 3.0% males, 3.5% females; 45–49 in Kingsgrove: 3.5% males, 3.7% females
- 40–44 in Belmore: 3.1% males, 3.4% females; 40–44 in Kingsgrove: 3.4% males, 3.6% females
- 35–39 in Belmore: 3.8% males, 3.5% females; 35–39 in Kingsgrove: 3.2% males, 3.4% females
- 30–34 in Belmore: 4.1% males, 3.9% females; 30–34 in Kingsgrove: 2.8% males, 3.1% females
- 25–29 in Belmore: 4.2% males, 3.8% females; 25–29 in Kingsgrove: 2.6% males, 2.4% females
- 20–24 in Belmore: 3.8% males, 3.3% females; 20–24 in Kingsgrove: 3.0% males, 2.9% females
- 15–19 in Belmore: 2.8% males, 2.4% females; 15–19 in Kingsgrove: 3.2% males, 2.6% females
- 10–14 in Belmore: 2.9% males, 2.4% females; 10–14 in Kingsgrove: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 5–9 in Belmore: 2.7% males, 2.4% females; 5–9 in Kingsgrove: 3.3% males, 2.9% females
- 0–4 in Belmore: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 0–4 in Kingsgrove: 2.8% males, 2.7% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $413
- First area, 2016: $504
- First area, 2021: $640
- Second area, 2011: $504
- Second area, 2016: $588
- Second area, 2021: $716
- First area, 2011: $987
- First area, 2016: $1,192
- First area, 2021: $1,456
- Second area, 2011: $1,257
- Second area, 2016: $1,564
- Second area, 2021: $1,898
- First area, 2011: $1,088
- First area, 2016: $1,339
- First area, 2021: $1,737
- Second area, 2011: $1,428
- Second area, 2016: $1,774
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.8
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 2.9
- Second area, 2016: 2.9
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $300
- First area, 2016: $360
- First area, 2021: $380
- Second area, 2011: $360
- Second area, 2016: $480
- Second area, 2021: $500
- First area, 2011: $1,950
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $2,156
- Second area, 2011: $2,500
- Second area, 2016: $2,350
- Second area, 2021: $2,600
- First area, 2011: 1.30
- First area, 2016: 1.10
- First area, 2021: 1.00
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Belmore with nearby areas
Compare Kingsgrove with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Belmore vs Kingsgrove [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10279/belmore/vs/SAL12166/kingsgrove