Compare
Hoxton Park vs Miller
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.3 km apart · Hoxton Park profile · Miller profile
Hoxton Park Miller
Hoxton Park and Miller are neighbouring areas in Greater Sydney with very different profiles. Hoxton Park is more affluent, with a typical weekly household income of $1,960 compared to $825 in Miller. This is consistent with a higher share of residents completing Year 12 (59.5% versus 39.5%) and a larger proportion of homes being separate houses (89.3% versus 67.9%). Hoxton Park also has a stronger overseas presence, with 46.2% born abroad and 58.3% using another language at home, which are both far higher than the figures in Miller.
These two areas share a typical resident age of 35 and similar access to parks and public transport. However, the gap in housing stability has widened, with renting now far more common in Miller, where 63.9% of homes are rented compared to 25.4% in Hoxton Park. This contrast extends to the typical weekly rent, which is far higher in Hoxton Park at $490, while Miller's is much lower at $201.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 4,208
- First area, 2016: 4,355
- First area, 2021: 4,572
- Second area, 2011: 3,088
- Second area, 2016: 3,237
- Second area, 2021: 3,374
- First area, 2011: 30 yrs
- First area, 2016: 32 yrs
- First area, 2021: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 35 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Hoxton Park: 0.2% males, 0.5% females; 85+ in Miller: 0.5% males, 0.9% females
- 80–84 in Hoxton Park: 0.5% males, 0.5% females; 80–84 in Miller: 0.5% males, 1.4% females
- 75–79 in Hoxton Park: 0.7% males, 0.7% females; 75–79 in Miller: 1.5% males, 1.2% females
- 70–74 in Hoxton Park: 1.4% males, 1.3% females; 70–74 in Miller: 1.4% males, 1.7% females
- 65–69 in Hoxton Park: 2.1% males, 2.0% females; 65–69 in Miller: 2.4% males, 2.1% females
- 60–64 in Hoxton Park: 2.7% males, 2.8% females; 60–64 in Miller: 3.0% males, 3.1% females
- 55–59 in Hoxton Park: 3.6% males, 3.5% females; 55–59 in Miller: 4.5% males, 2.6% females
- 50–54 in Hoxton Park: 3.1% males, 3.9% females; 50–54 in Miller: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 45–49 in Hoxton Park: 3.3% males, 3.5% females; 45–49 in Miller: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 40–44 in Hoxton Park: 3.1% males, 3.7% females; 40–44 in Miller: 2.5% males, 2.9% females
- 35–39 in Hoxton Park: 3.4% males, 4.0% females; 35–39 in Miller: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 30–34 in Hoxton Park: 2.7% males, 3.5% females; 30–34 in Miller: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 25–29 in Hoxton Park: 3.3% males, 2.9% females; 25–29 in Miller: 3.0% males, 2.8% females
- 20–24 in Hoxton Park: 3.2% males, 3.4% females; 20–24 in Miller: 4.3% males, 3.3% females
- 15–19 in Hoxton Park: 4.6% males, 3.5% females; 15–19 in Miller: 4.0% males, 3.2% females
- 10–14 in Hoxton Park: 4.3% males, 4.5% females; 10–14 in Miller: 3.9% males, 4.1% females
- 5–9 in Hoxton Park: 4.1% males, 3.6% females; 5–9 in Miller: 4.5% males, 3.7% females
- 0–4 in Hoxton Park: 3.1% males, 2.5% females; 0–4 in Miller: 3.1% males, 3.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $596
- First area, 2016: $589
- First area, 2021: $663
- Second area, 2011: $323
- Second area, 2016: $391
- Second area, 2021: $435
- First area, 2011: $1,574
- First area, 2016: $1,725
- First area, 2021: $1,960
- Second area, 2011: $593
- Second area, 2016: $739
- Second area, 2021: $825
- First area, 2011: $1,566
- First area, 2016: $1,707
- First area, 2021: $2,010
- Second area, 2011: $787
- Second area, 2016: $936
- Second area, 2021: $1,087
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.5
- First area, 2016: 3.6
- First area, 2021: 3.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $370
- First area, 2016: $450
- First area, 2021: $490
- Second area, 2011: $126
- Second area, 2016: $165
- Second area, 2021: $201
- First area, 2011: $2,383
- First area, 2016: $2,113
- First area, 2021: $2,139
- Second area, 2011: $1,517
- Second area, 2016: $1,452
- Second area, 2021: $1,800
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 1.00
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Hoxton Park with nearby areas
Compare Miller with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Hoxton Park vs Miller [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL11958/hoxton-park/vs/SAL12628/miller