Compare
Frogs Hollow vs Wolumla
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 4.5 km apart · Frogs Hollow profile · Wolumla profile
Frogs Hollow Wolumla
Wolumla and Frogs Hollow are neighbouring areas with very different characters. Wolumla is more developed and accessible, with a walkability score that is mostly car-dependent, while Frogs Hollow is simply car-dependent. Wolumla has a much higher share of people with no religion (49.8%) and a higher rate of long-term health conditions (34.7%). In contrast, Frogs Hollow is wealthier, with 21.6% of households earning $3,000 or more a week compared to 9.4% in Wolumla, and it has a much higher share of people working from home (24.5% versus 7.2%).
Both areas sit near the national figure for the share of children under 15, with Wolumla at 18.0% and Frogs Hollow slightly higher at 24.8%. They are also very similar in terms of typical weekly personal income, which is around $690 in Wolumla and $732 in Frogs Hollow. They share almost identical patterns in housing, such as having roughly 2.5 to 2.6 people per home and very similar rental rates.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 113
- First area, 2021: 117
- Second area, 2011: 874
- Second area, 2016: 703
- Second area, 2021: 767
- First area, 2016: 38 yrs
- First area, 2021: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 45 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Frogs Hollow: 3.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Wolumla: 0.5% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Frogs Hollow: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Wolumla: 1.3% males, 0.5% females
- 75–79 in Frogs Hollow: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Wolumla: 2.7% males, 1.6% females
- 70–74 in Frogs Hollow: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 70–74 in Wolumla: 2.9% males, 2.2% females
- 65–69 in Frogs Hollow: 3.0% males, 3.0% females; 65–69 in Wolumla: 3.9% males, 4.7% females
- 60–64 in Frogs Hollow: 5.1% males, 6.1% females; 60–64 in Wolumla: 5.1% males, 5.9% females
- 55–59 in Frogs Hollow: 3.0% males, 3.0% females; 55–59 in Wolumla: 3.4% males, 5.1% females
- 50–54 in Frogs Hollow: 3.0% males, 3.0% females; 50–54 in Wolumla: 3.8% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Frogs Hollow: 4.0% males, 5.1% females; 45–49 in Wolumla: 2.5% males, 2.9% females
- 40–44 in Frogs Hollow: 6.1% males, 4.0% females; 40–44 in Wolumla: 2.7% males, 2.2% females
- 35–39 in Frogs Hollow: 0.0% males, 3.0% females; 35–39 in Wolumla: 3.0% males, 3.5% females
- 30–34 in Frogs Hollow: 3.0% males, 0.0% females; 30–34 in Wolumla: 2.1% males, 3.1% females
- 25–29 in Frogs Hollow: 3.0% males, 4.0% females; 25–29 in Wolumla: 2.6% males, 2.2% females
- 20–24 in Frogs Hollow: 4.0% males, 0.0% females; 20–24 in Wolumla: 2.6% males, 1.0% females
- 15–19 in Frogs Hollow: 8.1% males, 4.0% females; 15–19 in Wolumla: 2.2% males, 2.6% females
- 10–14 in Frogs Hollow: 4.0% males, 5.1% females; 10–14 in Wolumla: 3.4% males, 2.2% females
- 5–9 in Frogs Hollow: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 5–9 in Wolumla: 3.1% males, 2.7% females
- 0–4 in Frogs Hollow: 5.1% males, 5.1% females; 0–4 in Wolumla: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $425
- First area, 2021: $732
- Second area, 2011: $514
- Second area, 2016: $577
- Second area, 2021: $690
- First area, 2016: $1,125
- First area, 2021: $1,292
- Second area, 2011: $1,029
- Second area, 2016: $1,130
- Second area, 2021: $1,396
- First area, 2016: $1,125
- First area, 2021: $2,049
- Second area, 2011: $1,129
- Second area, 2016: $1,357
- Second area, 2021: $1,486
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $200
- First area, 2021: $290
- Second area, 2011: $173
- Second area, 2016: $260
- Second area, 2021: $318
- First area, 2016: $1,445
- First area, 2021: $2,179
- Second area, 2011: $1,250
- Second area, 2016: $1,383
- Second area, 2021: $1,517
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Frogs Hollow with nearby areas
Compare Wolumla with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Frogs Hollow vs Wolumla [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL11575/frogs-hollow/vs/SAL14380/wolumla