Compare
Foxground vs Rose Valley
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 4.5 km apart · Foxground profile · Rose Valley profile
Foxground Rose Valley
Foxground and Rose Valley (Kiama - NSW) are neighbouring rural areas with very different populations. Foxground is far older, with a typical resident aged 60 compared to 43 in Rose Valley (Kiama - NSW). This is reflected in the family mix; Rose Valley (Kiama - NSW) has a much higher share of children under 15 (24.1% versus 6.7% in Foxground). Foxground is also more likely to be highly qualified, with 45.8% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher, and it has a higher share of people earning $2,000 or more a week (23.6% compared to 10.4%).
Both areas are very similar in terms of housing and income, with typical weekly household incomes around $2,150. They are equally car-dependent, as neither area has any public transport stops or walkable amenities. While they share these basics, they differ in how people work; 45.2% of people in Foxground work from home, which is far higher than the 26.0% in Rose Valley (Kiama - NSW).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 232
- First area, 2016: 147
- First area, 2021: 164
- Second area, 2016: 76
- Second area, 2021: 87
- First area, 2011: 53 yrs
- First area, 2016: 58 yrs
- First area, 2021: 60 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 43 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Foxground: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Foxground: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Rose Valley: 6.3% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Foxground: 4.8% males, 3.6% females; 75–79 in Rose Valley: 6.3% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Foxground: 4.8% males, 8.4% females; 70–74 in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 65–69 in Foxground: 7.2% males, 7.2% females; 65–69 in Rose Valley: 6.3% males, 6.3% females
- 60–64 in Foxground: 6.0% males, 6.0% females; 60–64 in Rose Valley: 4.7% males, 0.0% females
- 55–59 in Foxground: 4.8% males, 3.6% females; 55–59 in Rose Valley: 10.9% males, 4.7% females
- 50–54 in Foxground: 3.6% males, 3.0% females; 50–54 in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 45–49 in Foxground: 1.8% males, 4.8% females; 45–49 in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 6.3% females
- 40–44 in Foxground: 2.4% males, 4.8% females; 40–44 in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 6.3% females
- 35–39 in Foxground: 3.0% males, 0.0% females; 35–39 in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 30–34 in Foxground: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 30–34 in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 25–29 in Foxground: 3.0% males, 0.0% females; 25–29 in Rose Valley: 10.9% males, 0.0% females
- 20–24 in Foxground: 1.8% males, 3.0% females; 20–24 in Rose Valley: 4.7% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Foxground: 0.0% males, 2.4% females; 15–19 in Rose Valley: 12.5% males, 6.3% females
- 10–14 in Foxground: 2.4% males, 2.4% females; 10–14 in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 5–9 in Foxground: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 5–9 in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 0–4 in Foxground: 2.4% males, 3.0% females; 0–4 in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 7.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $549
- First area, 2016: $669
- First area, 2021: $978
- Second area, 2016: $1,042
- Second area, 2021: $1,062
- First area, 2011: $1,535
- First area, 2016: $1,458
- First area, 2021: $2,166
- Second area, 2016: $2,250
- Second area, 2021: $2,150
- First area, 2011: $1,675
- First area, 2016: $1,812
- First area, 2021: $2,250
- Second area, 2016: $2,250
- Second area, 2021: $2,333
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 3.0
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $400
- First area, 2016: $335
- First area, 2021: $570
- Second area, 2021: $300
- First area, 2011: $1,300
- First area, 2016: $2,282
- First area, 2021: $2,687
- Second area, 2016: $3,723
- Second area, 2021: $1,828
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Foxground with nearby areas
Compare Rose Valley with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Foxground vs Rose Valley [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL11561/foxground/vs/SAL13413/rose-valley