Compare
Rose Valley vs Saddleback Mountain
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.5 km apart · Rose Valley profile · Saddleback Mountain profile
Rose Valley Saddleback Mountain
Rose Valley (Kiama - NSW) and Saddleback Mountain are both sparsely populated areas. Rose Valley is younger, with 24.1% of its residents being children under 15, while the typical resident in Saddleback Mountain is far older at 59. Education and health also differ; 73.9% of Rose Valley residents finished Year 12, which is far higher than the 42.4% in Saddleback Mountain. Meanwhile, long-term health conditions are far more common in Saddleback Mountain, affecting 34.3% of people compared to 21.8% in Rose Valley (Kiama - NSW).
Everyday life is very similar in both places, as every home is a separate detached house and no one rents. Neither area has any public transport stops or people who use it to commute. While Rose Valley has more people working or looking for work at 64.9%, both areas have an equal share of households earning $3,000 or more a week. This shared prosperity is seen in how both areas sit far above the national figure for homes owned outright.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 76
- First area, 2021: 87
- Second area, 2016: 73
- Second area, 2021: 67
- First area, 2016: 44 yrs
- First area, 2021: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 59 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Saddleback Mountain: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Rose Valley: 6.3% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Saddleback Mountain: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Rose Valley: 6.3% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Saddleback Mountain: 16.3% males, 7.0% females
- 70–74 in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 70–74 in Saddleback Mountain: 0.0% males, 9.3% females
- 65–69 in Rose Valley: 6.3% males, 6.3% females; 65–69 in Saddleback Mountain: 0.0% males, 7.0% females
- 60–64 in Rose Valley: 4.7% males, 0.0% females; 60–64 in Saddleback Mountain: 0.0% males, 11.6% females
- 55–59 in Rose Valley: 10.9% males, 4.7% females; 55–59 in Saddleback Mountain: 9.3% males, 0.0% females
- 50–54 in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 50–54 in Saddleback Mountain: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 45–49 in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 6.3% females; 45–49 in Saddleback Mountain: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 40–44 in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 6.3% females; 40–44 in Saddleback Mountain: 0.0% males, 7.0% females
- 35–39 in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 35–39 in Saddleback Mountain: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 30–34 in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 30–34 in Saddleback Mountain: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 25–29 in Rose Valley: 10.9% males, 0.0% females; 25–29 in Saddleback Mountain: 7.0% males, 0.0% females
- 20–24 in Rose Valley: 4.7% males, 0.0% females; 20–24 in Saddleback Mountain: 11.6% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Rose Valley: 12.5% males, 6.3% females; 15–19 in Saddleback Mountain: 7.0% males, 7.0% females
- 10–14 in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 10–14 in Saddleback Mountain: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 5–9 in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 5–9 in Saddleback Mountain: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 0–4 in Rose Valley: 0.0% males, 7.8% females; 0–4 in Saddleback Mountain: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $1,042
- First area, 2021: $1,062
- Second area, 2016: $814
- Second area, 2021: $900
- First area, 2016: $2,250
- First area, 2021: $2,150
- Second area, 2016: $2,124
- Second area, 2021: $1,916
- First area, 2016: $2,250
- First area, 2021: $2,333
- Second area, 2016: $2,124
- Second area, 2021: $1,937
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 3.0
- First area, 2021: 2.9
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $3,723
- First area, 2021: $1,828
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $4,333
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Rose Valley with nearby areas
Compare Saddleback Mountain with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Rose Valley vs Saddleback Mountain [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL13413/rose-valley/vs/SAL13475/saddleback-mountain