Compare
Dover Heights vs Tamarama
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 3.0 km apart · Dover Heights profile · Tamarama profile
Dover Heights Tamarama
Dover Heights and Tamarama are neighbouring areas with very different housing and social profiles. Dover Heights is more likely to have separate houses, with 66.2% compared to 23.3% in Tamarama, and homes there are typically larger, as 80.3% have three or more bedrooms. This is consistent with a population that is noticeably older, with a typical resident aged 41, and a higher share of children under 15. In contrast, Tamarama has a much higher proportion of renters (45.3% versus 19.4%) and more people in de facto relationships (23.5% versus 7.2%).
While these areas differ in layout, the number of people who have moved house in the last five years is far higher in Tamarama, and this gap has widened over time. Both areas are’ high-income pockets with typical weekly family incomes around $4,600 to $4,800. They also share similar commute times to the city and have very few residents who speak little or no English.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 3,940
- First area, 2016: 3,802
- First area, 2021: 4,044
- Second area, 2011: 1,450
- Second area, 2016: 1,622
- Second area, 2021: 1,478
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 41 yrs
- First area, 2021: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 36 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Dover Heights: 1.0% males, 0.8% females; 85+ in Tamarama: 0.0% males, 0.3% females
- 80–84 in Dover Heights: 0.6% males, 0.9% females; 80–84 in Tamarama: 0.5% males, 0.2% females
- 75–79 in Dover Heights: 1.6% males, 1.8% females; 75–79 in Tamarama: 0.8% males, 1.1% females
- 70–74 in Dover Heights: 2.3% males, 2.2% females; 70–74 in Tamarama: 1.6% males, 1.4% females
- 65–69 in Dover Heights: 2.7% males, 2.9% females; 65–69 in Tamarama: 1.5% males, 1.3% females
- 60–64 in Dover Heights: 3.2% males, 3.0% females; 60–64 in Tamarama: 2.5% males, 2.1% females
- 55–59 in Dover Heights: 3.4% males, 3.1% females; 55–59 in Tamarama: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 50–54 in Dover Heights: 3.9% males, 3.8% females; 50–54 in Tamarama: 4.4% males, 4.4% females
- 45–49 in Dover Heights: 3.8% males, 4.4% females; 45–49 in Tamarama: 3.1% males, 2.7% females
- 40–44 in Dover Heights: 2.6% males, 3.5% females; 40–44 in Tamarama: 4.0% males, 3.3% females
- 35–39 in Dover Heights: 2.0% males, 2.8% females; 35–39 in Tamarama: 5.8% males, 5.6% females
- 30–34 in Dover Heights: 2.1% males, 2.3% females; 30–34 in Tamarama: 5.9% males, 5.3% females
- 25–29 in Dover Heights: 2.6% males, 2.4% females; 25–29 in Tamarama: 4.7% males, 5.8% females
- 20–24 in Dover Heights: 2.9% males, 3.2% females; 20–24 in Tamarama: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 15–19 in Dover Heights: 3.9% males, 3.9% females; 15–19 in Tamarama: 2.1% males, 2.6% females
- 10–14 in Dover Heights: 4.6% males, 4.3% females; 10–14 in Tamarama: 1.8% males, 1.8% females
- 5–9 in Dover Heights: 3.4% males, 3.1% females; 5–9 in Tamarama: 2.5% males, 2.0% females
- 0–4 in Dover Heights: 2.7% males, 2.2% females; 0–4 in Tamarama: 4.6% males, 2.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $926
- First area, 2016: $1,145
- First area, 2021: $1,404
- Second area, 2011: $1,308
- Second area, 2016: $1,414
- Second area, 2021: $1,788
- First area, 2011: $2,508
- First area, 2016: $3,031
- First area, 2021: $3,877
- Second area, 2011: $2,666
- Second area, 2016: $3,348
- Second area, 2021: $4,522
- First area, 2011: $2,739
- First area, 2016: $3,570
- First area, 2021: $4,572
- Second area, 2011: $2,856
- Second area, 2016: $3,713
- Second area, 2021: $4,771
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 3.0
- First area, 2021: 3.0
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $501
- First area, 2016: $725
- First area, 2021: $798
- Second area, 2011: $630
- Second area, 2016: $710
- Second area, 2021: $850
- First area, 2011: $4,275
- First area, 2016: $4,000
- First area, 2021: $4,333
- Second area, 2011: $3,500
- Second area, 2016: $3,640
- Second area, 2021: $4,109
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 1.00
- Second area, 2021: 1.00
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Dover Heights with nearby areas
Compare Tamarama with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Dover Heights vs Tamarama [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL11286/dover-heights/vs/SAL13757/tamarama