Compare
Cundletown vs Moto
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 7.3 km apart · Cundletown profile · Moto profile
Cundletown Moto
Cundletown and Moto are neighbouring areas in New South Wales, though they differ greatly in scale and layout. Cundletown is more populated and walkable, with a walkability score of 3.1 (mostly car-dependent) and 71% of homes within a 10-minute walk of public transport. In contrast, Moto is sparsely populated and entirely car-dependent, with 0% of homes near public transport. Cundletown also has a higher typical weekly family income of $1,536, compared to $1,062 in Moto, and a higher share of large homes, with 85.7% having three or more bedrooms compared to 69.2% in Moto.
Both areas sit close to the national figure for children under 15, with Cundletown at 18.8% and Moto at 15.3%. They also share a similar proportion of residents aged 65 and over and a similar share of adults with a bachelor degree or higher. While Moto has a noticeably older typical resident at 51 years compared to 46 in Cundletown, the two areas track closely in their levels of educational attainment and the share of people providing unpaid care.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,064
- First area, 2016: 2,054
- First area, 2021: 2,050
- Second area, 2011: 290
- Second area, 2016: 135
- Second area, 2021: 144
- First area, 2011: 45 yrs
- First area, 2016: 47 yrs
- First area, 2021: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 49 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 50 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 51 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Cundletown: 1.3% males, 3.0% females; 85+ in Moto: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Cundletown: 2.0% males, 2.2% females; 80–84 in Moto: 0.0% males, 3.7% females
- 75–79 in Cundletown: 1.9% males, 1.9% females; 75–79 in Moto: 3.0% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Cundletown: 3.3% males, 3.6% females; 70–74 in Moto: 4.5% males, 0.0% females
- 65–69 in Cundletown: 3.0% males, 3.6% females; 65–69 in Moto: 6.7% males, 4.5% females
- 60–64 in Cundletown: 3.9% males, 3.9% females; 60–64 in Moto: 6.0% males, 7.5% females
- 55–59 in Cundletown: 3.0% males, 3.0% females; 55–59 in Moto: 5.2% males, 2.2% females
- 50–54 in Cundletown: 2.7% males, 2.9% females; 50–54 in Moto: 3.0% males, 4.5% females
- 45–49 in Cundletown: 2.3% males, 2.7% females; 45–49 in Moto: 3.0% males, 0.0% females
- 40–44 in Cundletown: 2.4% males, 2.6% females; 40–44 in Moto: 4.5% males, 4.5% females
- 35–39 in Cundletown: 2.4% males, 2.5% females; 35–39 in Moto: 0.0% males, 6.7% females
- 30–34 in Cundletown: 2.4% males, 2.6% females; 30–34 in Moto: 3.7% males, 0.0% females
- 25–29 in Cundletown: 2.2% males, 3.0% females; 25–29 in Moto: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 20–24 in Cundletown: 2.2% males, 2.3% females; 20–24 in Moto: 2.2% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Cundletown: 2.8% males, 3.3% females; 15–19 in Moto: 6.0% males, 6.7% females
- 10–14 in Cundletown: 3.2% males, 2.7% females; 10–14 in Moto: 4.5% males, 0.0% females
- 5–9 in Cundletown: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 5–9 in Moto: 3.7% males, 3.7% females
- 0–4 in Cundletown: 3.5% males, 2.5% females; 0–4 in Moto: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $399
- First area, 2016: $538
- First area, 2021: $640
- Second area, 2011: $387
- Second area, 2016: $397
- Second area, 2021: $434
- First area, 2011: $846
- First area, 2016: $1,073
- First area, 2021: $1,305
- Second area, 2011: $863
- Second area, 2016: $900
- Second area, 2021: $1,075
- First area, 2011: $1,042
- First area, 2016: $1,254
- First area, 2021: $1,536
- Second area, 2011: $977
- Second area, 2016: $900
- Second area, 2021: $1,062
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $250
- First area, 2016: $285
- First area, 2021: $350
- Second area, 2011: $130
- Second area, 2016: $185
- Second area, 2021: $300
- First area, 2011: $1,300
- First area, 2016: $1,300
- First area, 2021: $1,387
- Second area, 2011: $1,733
- Second area, 2016: $585
- Second area, 2021: $2,325
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.60
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Cundletown with nearby areas
Compare Moto with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Cundletown vs Moto [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL11162/cundletown/vs/SAL12753/moto