Compare
Cooplacurripa vs Giro
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 19 km apart · Cooplacurripa profile · Giro profile
Cooplacurripa Giro
Cooplacurripa and Giro are both sparsely populated areas in New South Wales. The most striking difference is the usual weekly personal income, which is far higher in Giro at $3,250 compared to $1,062 in Cooplacurripa. Other gaps include the typical age of residents, who are noticeably older in Cooplacurripa at 62 years, and the landscape, with the mean terrain slope well higher in Cooplacurripa at 24.3%.
Both areas have tracked similarly since 2011 as very quiet, rural places. They are both car-dependent, with no homes within a 15-minute walk of schools, parks, groceries, or health services. In both Cooplacurripa and Giro, the walkability score is 0.0, which means they are both car-dependent.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 12
- First area, 2021: 9
- Second area, 2016: 0
- Second area, 2021: 0
- First area, 2016: 56 yrs
- First area, 2021: 62 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 58 yrs
Education & Qualifications
Income
- First area, 2016: $366
- First area, 2021: $1,062
- Second area, 2021: $3,250
- First area, 2016: $949
- First area, 2021: $1,062
First Nations
Family & Households
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: 0.50
- First area, 2021: 0.60
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Cooplacurripa with nearby areas
Compare Giro with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Cooplacurripa vs Giro [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL11050/cooplacurripa/vs/SAL11637/giro