Compare
Curricabark vs Giro
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 9.1 km apart · Curricabark profile · Giro profile
Curricabark Giro
Curricabark and Giro are both sparsely populated, rural areas in New South Wales. The most striking difference is the typical weekly personal income, which is far higher in Giro at $3,250 compared to $900 in Curricabark. Giro also has a steeper landscape, with a mean terrain slope that is well higher at 14.9% than the 10.5% seen in Curricabark.
Both areas are almost identical in that they are completely car-dependent, with no homes within a 15-minute walk of shops, schools, or health services. They also share the same typical resident age of 58 years. While Curricabark has a very small population of 8 people, Giro is currently recorded as having no residents.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 11
- First area, 2021: 8
- Second area, 2016: 0
- Second area, 2021: 0
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 58 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 58 yrs
Education & Qualifications
Income
- First area, 2016: $575
- First area, 2021: $900
- Second area, 2021: $3,250
First Nations
Family & Households
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: 1.00
- First area, 2021: 0.80
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Curricabark with nearby areas
Compare Giro with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Curricabark vs Giro [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL11181/curricabark/vs/SAL11637/giro