Compare
Cells River vs Cooplacurripa
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 14 km apart · Cells River profile · Cooplacurripa profile
Cells River Cooplacurripa
Cooplacurripa and Cells River are both sparsely populated, largely non-residential areas. The few people living in Cooplacurripa are far older, with a typical age of 62, while the typical age in Cells River is 54. Typical weekly personal income is far higher in Cells River at $2,374, compared to $1,062 in Cooplacurripa.
Everyday life in both places is car-dependent, as neither area has a walkability score above zero or any shops, parks, or health services within a 15-minute walk. They are also alike in that both have a typical weekly household income around $1,100, and neither has any schools or public transport stops.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 0
- First area, 2021: 0
- Second area, 2016: 12
- Second area, 2021: 9
- First area, 2021: 54 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 56 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 62 yrs
Education & Qualifications
Income
- First area, 2021: $2,374
- Second area, 2016: $366
- Second area, 2021: $1,062
- First area, 2021: $1,125
- Second area, 2016: $949
- Second area, 2021: $1,062
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2021: 1.0
- Second area, 2016: 1.5
- Second area, 2021: 1.7
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2021: 0.30
- Second area, 2016: 0.50
- Second area, 2021: 0.60
Transport & Vehicles
Walkability
Compare Cells River with nearby areas
Compare Cooplacurripa with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Cells River vs Cooplacurripa [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10871/cells-river/vs/SAL11050/cooplacurripa