Compare
Camellia vs Clyde
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 1.7 km apart · Camellia profile · Clyde profile
Camellia Clyde
Clyde (NSW) and Camellia are both sparsely populated, largely non-residential areas. Residents are far older in Clyde (NSW), where the typical age is 51, compared to 32 in Camellia. There is a large gap in weekly personal income, which is far higher in Camellia at $1,125 than the $574 seen in Clyde (NSW). Clyde (NSW) is also more walkable, with a score of 6.3 (very walkable) compared to 5.2 (somewhat walkable) in Camellia.
Both areas share very similar terrain and school settings, with almost identical average school sizes and numbers of schools nearby. While they are alike in these ways, they differ in their transport links; Clyde (NSW) has far more public transport stops and routes, and its residents are far more likely to use buses. In contrast, those in Camellia use trams or light rail for all their public transport needs.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 0
- First area, 2021: 0
- Second area, 2011: 0
- Second area, 2016: 6
- Second area, 2021: 9
- First area, 2021: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 56 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 51 yrs
Education & Qualifications
Income
- First area, 2021: $1,125
- Second area, 2016: $350
- Second area, 2021: $574
First Nations
Family & Households
Housing & Dwellings
Transport & Vehicles
Walkability
Compare Camellia with nearby areas
Compare Clyde with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Camellia vs Clyde [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10773/camellia/vs/SAL10940/clyde