Compare
Bombo vs Saddleback Mountain
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 7.0 km apart · Bombo profile · Saddleback Mountain profile
Bombo Saddleback Mountain
Bombo and Saddleback Mountain are neighbouring areas with very different profiles. Bombo is a more mobile and younger place, where the typical resident is 40 and over half the people have moved there in the last five years. It has a higher proportion of high earners, with 23.0% earning $2,000 or more a week, and it is more likely to have renters. In contrast, Saddleback Mountain is far older, with a typical age of 59 and 31.3% of people aged 65 and over. Most homes there are owned outright (68.0%), and residents are more likely to be volunteers (26.6%).
Both areas sit near the national figure for the number of people who care for children unpaid. They also share similar typical weekly incomes and nearly identical rates of people working from home. While Bombo is mostly car-dependent, it is slightly more walkable than Saddleback Mountain, which is described as car-dependent.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 30
- First area, 2016: 112
- First area, 2021: 175
- Second area, 2016: 73
- Second area, 2021: 67
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 49 yrs
- First area, 2021: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 59 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bombo: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Saddleback Mountain: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Bombo: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Saddleback Mountain: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Bombo: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Saddleback Mountain: 16.3% males, 7.0% females
- 70–74 in Bombo: 3.3% males, 2.2% females; 70–74 in Saddleback Mountain: 0.0% males, 9.3% females
- 65–69 in Bombo: 4.4% males, 4.4% females; 65–69 in Saddleback Mountain: 0.0% males, 7.0% females
- 60–64 in Bombo: 0.0% males, 1.7% females; 60–64 in Saddleback Mountain: 0.0% males, 11.6% females
- 55–59 in Bombo: 4.4% males, 2.8% females; 55–59 in Saddleback Mountain: 9.3% males, 0.0% females
- 50–54 in Bombo: 5.6% males, 5.6% females; 50–54 in Saddleback Mountain: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 45–49 in Bombo: 4.4% males, 3.9% females; 45–49 in Saddleback Mountain: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 40–44 in Bombo: 2.2% males, 3.9% females; 40–44 in Saddleback Mountain: 0.0% males, 7.0% females
- 35–39 in Bombo: 2.8% males, 1.7% females; 35–39 in Saddleback Mountain: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 30–34 in Bombo: 0.0% males, 5.0% females; 30–34 in Saddleback Mountain: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 25–29 in Bombo: 3.9% males, 1.7% females; 25–29 in Saddleback Mountain: 7.0% males, 0.0% females
- 20–24 in Bombo: 3.9% males, 1.7% females; 20–24 in Saddleback Mountain: 11.6% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Bombo: 6.1% males, 5.6% females; 15–19 in Saddleback Mountain: 7.0% males, 7.0% females
- 10–14 in Bombo: 1.7% males, 3.9% females; 10–14 in Saddleback Mountain: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 5–9 in Bombo: 3.3% males, 2.2% females; 5–9 in Saddleback Mountain: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 0–4 in Bombo: 4.4% males, 3.3% females; 0–4 in Saddleback Mountain: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $475
- First area, 2016: $560
- First area, 2021: $949
- Second area, 2016: $814
- Second area, 2021: $900
- First area, 2011: $700
- First area, 2016: $1,375
- First area, 2021: $2,594
- Second area, 2016: $2,124
- Second area, 2021: $1,916
- First area, 2011: $1,899
- First area, 2016: $1,937
- First area, 2021: $2,714
- Second area, 2016: $2,124
- Second area, 2021: $1,937
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.0
- First area, 2021: 2.9
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $365
- First area, 2021: $610
- Second area, 2021: $350
- First area, 2011: $2,600
- First area, 2016: $2,383
- First area, 2021: $3,250
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $4,333
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bombo with nearby areas
Compare Saddleback Mountain with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bombo vs Saddleback Mountain [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10457/bombo/vs/SAL13475/saddleback-mountain