Compare
Blaxlands Ridge vs Sackville
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 8.0 km apart · Blaxlands Ridge profile · Sackville profile
Blaxlands Ridge Sackville
Blaxlands Ridge and Sackville are neighbouring areas in the Hawkesbury region with distinct profiles. Blaxlands Ridge has a wealthier population, with a typical weekly household income of $2,764 and 43.4% of homes earning $3,000 or more a week. It also has more children and larger homes, with 94% having three or more bedrooms. In contrast, Sackville has a stronger First Nations presence, with 9.6% of its population identifying as such and 31.8% speaking a First Nations language. Sackville is also more likely to have people living alone, at 23.5% compared to just 6% in Blaxlands Ridge.
Both areas have tracked similarly since 2011, remaining very car-dependent with no one commuting by public transport and nearly identical drive times to the city. They share similar levels of university qualifications and monthly mortgage payments. However, the two differ in local access; Sackville has more public transport stops and street connectivity, while Blaxlands Ridge has more homes within a 15-minute walk of a park.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 464
- First area, 2016: 501
- First area, 2021: 589
- Second area, 2011: 251
- Second area, 2016: 298
- Second area, 2021: 230
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 38 yrs
- First area, 2021: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 46 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Blaxlands Ridge: 0.0% males, 0.7% females; 85+ in Sackville: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Blaxlands Ridge: 0.5% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Sackville: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Blaxlands Ridge: 1.7% males, 1.7% females; 75–79 in Sackville: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Blaxlands Ridge: 2.2% males, 2.4% females; 70–74 in Sackville: 2.8% males, 2.8% females
- 65–69 in Blaxlands Ridge: 2.1% males, 2.9% females; 65–69 in Sackville: 5.2% males, 2.3% females
- 60–64 in Blaxlands Ridge: 4.6% males, 4.3% females; 60–64 in Sackville: 4.7% males, 3.3% females
- 55–59 in Blaxlands Ridge: 4.3% males, 3.9% females; 55–59 in Sackville: 7.5% males, 8.0% females
- 50–54 in Blaxlands Ridge: 2.4% males, 3.1% females; 50–54 in Sackville: 4.7% males, 5.2% females
- 45–49 in Blaxlands Ridge: 2.9% males, 4.3% females; 45–49 in Sackville: 3.8% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in Blaxlands Ridge: 2.7% males, 3.1% females; 40–44 in Sackville: 1.9% males, 1.4% females
- 35–39 in Blaxlands Ridge: 3.2% males, 3.2% females; 35–39 in Sackville: 1.9% males, 1.9% females
- 30–34 in Blaxlands Ridge: 3.1% males, 2.2% females; 30–34 in Sackville: 2.8% males, 4.7% females
- 25–29 in Blaxlands Ridge: 1.5% males, 2.1% females; 25–29 in Sackville: 6.6% males, 5.6% females
- 20–24 in Blaxlands Ridge: 2.7% males, 3.1% females; 20–24 in Sackville: 3.3% males, 1.9% females
- 15–19 in Blaxlands Ridge: 4.3% males, 3.8% females; 15–19 in Sackville: 2.8% males, 0.0% females
- 10–14 in Blaxlands Ridge: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 10–14 in Sackville: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 5–9 in Blaxlands Ridge: 5.0% males, 4.6% females; 5–9 in Sackville: 1.9% males, 2.8% females
- 0–4 in Blaxlands Ridge: 1.9% males, 3.4% females; 0–4 in Sackville: 4.2% males, 2.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $658
- First area, 2016: $793
- First area, 2021: $888
- Second area, 2011: $700
- Second area, 2016: $846
- Second area, 2021: $973
- First area, 2011: $2,068
- First area, 2016: $2,134
- First area, 2021: $2,764
- Second area, 2011: $1,208
- Second area, 2016: $1,786
- Second area, 2021: $2,178
- First area, 2011: $1,921
- First area, 2016: $2,151
- First area, 2021: $2,723
- Second area, 2011: $1,696
- Second area, 2016: $1,910
- Second area, 2021: $2,428
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.6
- First area, 2016: 3.3
- First area, 2021: 3.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.8
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $190
- First area, 2016: $500
- First area, 2021: $470
- Second area, 2011: $325
- Second area, 2016: $300
- Second area, 2021: $415
- First area, 2011: $2,600
- First area, 2016: $2,383
- First area, 2021: $2,600
- Second area, 2011: $2,405
- Second area, 2016: $2,080
- Second area, 2021: $2,550
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Blaxlands Ridge with nearby areas
Compare Sackville with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Blaxlands Ridge vs Sackville [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10408/blaxlands-ridge/vs/SAL13473/sackville