Compare
Auburn vs Regents Park
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 3.2 km apart · Auburn profile · Regents Park profile
Auburn Regents Park
Auburn and Regents Park are neighbouring areas with very different levels of convenience and housing. Auburn is a walker's paradise with a score of 8.1, where 85.2% of homes are within a 15 minute walk of groceries. In contrast, Regents Park is only somewhat walkable, with just 12.0% of homes near groceries and 0.0% near health services. Auburn is also much more transient and international, with 31.2% of people arriving from overseas recently and 64.3% born abroad. Regents Park has a more settled feel and more detached houses, which are 22.3 percentage points more common there than in Auburn.
These two areas have remained similar in several ways, including typical weekly incomes and the share of children under 15. However, some gaps are widening, such as the divide in accessibility; Auburn's advantage in walking to shops and health services is far higher than in Regents Park. Both areas have a strong international character, with many residents using a language other than English at home, though this is well higher in Auburn at 78.7% compared to 69.8% in Regents Park.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 33,122
- First area, 2016: 37,366
- First area, 2021: 39,333
- Second area, 2011: 4,511
- Second area, 2016: 4,926
- Second area, 2021: 4,990
- First area, 2011: 29 yrs
- First area, 2016: 30 yrs
- First area, 2021: 31 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 36 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Auburn: 0.5% males, 0.8% females; 85+ in Regents Park: 0.5% males, 0.9% females
- 80–84 in Auburn: 0.5% males, 0.7% females; 80–84 in Regents Park: 0.8% males, 1.0% females
- 75–79 in Auburn: 1.0% males, 0.8% females; 75–79 in Regents Park: 1.0% males, 1.0% females
- 70–74 in Auburn: 1.2% males, 1.3% females; 70–74 in Regents Park: 1.6% males, 2.1% females
- 65–69 in Auburn: 1.6% males, 1.7% females; 65–69 in Regents Park: 2.9% males, 2.5% females
- 60–64 in Auburn: 2.2% males, 2.0% females; 60–64 in Regents Park: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 55–59 in Auburn: 2.6% males, 2.4% females; 55–59 in Regents Park: 3.0% males, 3.2% females
- 50–54 in Auburn: 2.8% males, 2.4% females; 50–54 in Regents Park: 2.7% males, 3.2% females
- 45–49 in Auburn: 2.8% males, 2.2% females; 45–49 in Regents Park: 3.0% males, 2.5% females
- 40–44 in Auburn: 3.4% males, 2.5% females; 40–44 in Regents Park: 3.0% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Auburn: 4.4% males, 3.2% females; 35–39 in Regents Park: 3.7% males, 3.3% females
- 30–34 in Auburn: 6.0% males, 4.4% females; 30–34 in Regents Park: 5.1% males, 3.7% females
- 25–29 in Auburn: 7.4% males, 5.2% females; 25–29 in Regents Park: 4.8% males, 3.4% females
- 20–24 in Auburn: 6.7% males, 5.0% females; 20–24 in Regents Park: 3.9% males, 4.0% females
- 15–19 in Auburn: 2.5% males, 2.3% females; 15–19 in Regents Park: 3.1% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Auburn: 2.5% males, 2.6% females; 10–14 in Regents Park: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 5–9 in Auburn: 3.1% males, 2.9% females; 5–9 in Regents Park: 2.9% males, 2.7% females
- 0–4 in Auburn: 3.4% males, 3.0% females; 0–4 in Regents Park: 2.9% males, 2.7% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $352
- First area, 2016: $434
- First area, 2021: $580
- Second area, 2011: $405
- Second area, 2016: $479
- Second area, 2021: $566
- First area, 2011: $968
- First area, 2016: $1,240
- First area, 2021: $1,533
- Second area, 2011: $974
- Second area, 2016: $1,203
- Second area, 2021: $1,402
- First area, 2011: $957
- First area, 2016: $1,151
- First area, 2021: $1,440
- Second area, 2011: $1,095
- Second area, 2016: $1,336
- Second area, 2021: $1,560
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.3
- First area, 2016: 3.5
- First area, 2021: 3.3
- Second area, 2011: 3.0
- Second area, 2016: 3.0
- Second area, 2021: 3.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $320
- First area, 2016: $400
- First area, 2021: $410
- Second area, 2011: $300
- Second area, 2016: $370
- Second area, 2021: $370
- First area, 2011: $1,800
- First area, 2016: $1,733
- First area, 2021: $2,000
- Second area, 2011: $1,732
- Second area, 2016: $1,709
- Second area, 2021: $1,954
- First area, 2011: 1.40
- First area, 2016: 1.30
- First area, 2021: 1.20
- Second area, 2011: 1.30
- Second area, 2016: 1.10
- Second area, 2021: 1.00
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Auburn with nearby areas
Compare Regents Park with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Auburn vs Regents Park [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10107/auburn/vs/SAL13358/regents-park