Compare
Auburn vs Lidcombe
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.4 km apart · Auburn profile · Lidcombe profile
Auburn Lidcombe
Auburn and Lidcombe are two neighbouring areas in Greater Sydney with distinct profiles. Lidcombe has a more qualified workforce, with 34.4% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher compared to 24.1% in Auburn. This is consistent with a higher typical weekly personal income in Lidcombe ($741) than in Auburn ($580). Auburn is more welcoming to new arrivals, with 31.2% of residents arriving from overseas recently, and it offers better access to essential services; 82.7% of Auburn homes are within a 15-minute walk of health services, while only 28.3% of Lidcombe homes are.
Both areas are almost identical in the proportion of their population aged 65 and over, sitting at around 10% to 11%. They also share a high level of cultural diversity, as a huge majority of residents in both places use a language other than English at home. While they share these traits, some gaps are widening; for example, the difference in the number of people working from home has grown, with 30.5% in Lidcombe and 17.0% in Auburn.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 33,122
- First area, 2016: 37,366
- First area, 2021: 39,333
- Second area, 2011: 16,670
- Second area, 2016: 19,627
- Second area, 2021: 23,663
- First area, 2011: 29 yrs
- First area, 2016: 30 yrs
- First area, 2021: 31 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 33 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Auburn: 0.5% males, 0.8% females; 85+ in Lidcombe: 0.6% males, 0.6% females
- 80–84 in Auburn: 0.5% males, 0.7% females; 80–84 in Lidcombe: 0.6% males, 0.6% females
- 75–79 in Auburn: 1.0% males, 0.8% females; 75–79 in Lidcombe: 0.9% males, 0.9% females
- 70–74 in Auburn: 1.2% males, 1.3% females; 70–74 in Lidcombe: 1.3% males, 1.3% females
- 65–69 in Auburn: 1.6% males, 1.7% females; 65–69 in Lidcombe: 2.0% males, 2.2% females
- 60–64 in Auburn: 2.2% males, 2.0% females; 60–64 in Lidcombe: 2.8% males, 2.6% females
- 55–59 in Auburn: 2.6% males, 2.4% females; 55–59 in Lidcombe: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 50–54 in Auburn: 2.8% males, 2.4% females; 50–54 in Lidcombe: 2.7% males, 3.0% females
- 45–49 in Auburn: 2.8% males, 2.2% females; 45–49 in Lidcombe: 2.6% males, 2.5% females
- 40–44 in Auburn: 3.4% males, 2.5% females; 40–44 in Lidcombe: 3.3% males, 2.8% females
- 35–39 in Auburn: 4.4% males, 3.2% females; 35–39 in Lidcombe: 4.9% males, 4.2% females
- 30–34 in Auburn: 6.0% males, 4.4% females; 30–34 in Lidcombe: 6.8% males, 5.6% females
- 25–29 in Auburn: 7.4% males, 5.2% females; 25–29 in Lidcombe: 6.9% males, 6.3% females
- 20–24 in Auburn: 6.7% males, 5.0% females; 20–24 in Lidcombe: 4.7% males, 4.3% females
- 15–19 in Auburn: 2.5% males, 2.3% females; 15–19 in Lidcombe: 2.0% males, 1.8% females
- 10–14 in Auburn: 2.5% males, 2.6% females; 10–14 in Lidcombe: 2.0% males, 1.8% females
- 5–9 in Auburn: 3.1% males, 2.9% females; 5–9 in Lidcombe: 2.2% males, 2.3% females
- 0–4 in Auburn: 3.4% males, 3.0% females; 0–4 in Lidcombe: 2.8% males, 2.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $352
- First area, 2016: $434
- First area, 2021: $580
- Second area, 2011: $444
- Second area, 2016: $524
- Second area, 2021: $741
- First area, 2011: $968
- First area, 2016: $1,240
- First area, 2021: $1,533
- Second area, 2011: $1,230
- Second area, 2016: $1,571
- Second area, 2021: $1,888
- First area, 2011: $957
- First area, 2016: $1,151
- First area, 2021: $1,440
- Second area, 2011: $1,238
- Second area, 2016: $1,495
- Second area, 2021: $1,898
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.3
- First area, 2016: 3.5
- First area, 2021: 3.3
- Second area, 2011: 3.1
- Second area, 2016: 3.2
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $320
- First area, 2016: $400
- First area, 2021: $410
- Second area, 2011: $370
- Second area, 2016: $470
- Second area, 2021: $500
- First area, 2011: $1,800
- First area, 2016: $1,733
- First area, 2021: $2,000
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $2,100
- Second area, 2021: $2,308
- First area, 2011: 1.40
- First area, 2016: 1.30
- First area, 2021: 1.20
- Second area, 2011: 1.30
- Second area, 2016: 1.10
- Second area, 2021: 1.10
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Auburn with nearby areas
Compare Lidcombe with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Auburn vs Lidcombe [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10107/auburn/vs/SAL12325/lidcombe