Compare
Ashbury vs Hurlstone Park
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 1.6 km apart · Ashbury profile · Hurlstone Park profile
Ashbury Hurlstone Park
Hurlstone Park and Ashbury are neighbouring areas in Sydney's west with very different housing styles. Ashbury is dominated by separate houses, which are far higher there at 90.2%, while Hurlstone Park has far more flats and apartments. This is reflected in the home sizes; homes with three or more bedrooms are far higher in Ashbury at 84.2% compared to 57.1% in Hurlstone Park. Rental activity is also far higher in Hurlstone Park, where 32.3% of homes are rented, compared to just 12.3% in Ashbury.
Daily life is similar in both places, with almost identical unemployment rates and a nearly equal share of residents aged 65 and over. Both areas also have the same number of people per bedroom. However, some gaps are widening or shifting; Hurlstone Park has seen more people move in over the last five years than Ashbury. Hurlstone Park also has a far higher share of people with no religion at 41.3%, while Ashbury is much lower at 27.1%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 3,134
- First area, 2016: 3,329
- First area, 2021: 3,353
- Second area, 2011: 4,692
- Second area, 2016: 4,692
- Second area, 2021: 5,001
- First area, 2011: 41 yrs
- First area, 2016: 42 yrs
- First area, 2021: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 42 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Ashbury: 1.0% males, 1.0% females; 85+ in Hurlstone Park: 1.4% males, 1.2% females
- 80–84 in Ashbury: 1.3% males, 1.3% females; 80–84 in Hurlstone Park: 1.3% males, 1.8% females
- 75–79 in Ashbury: 1.9% males, 1.9% females; 75–79 in Hurlstone Park: 1.7% males, 1.9% females
- 70–74 in Ashbury: 2.3% males, 2.9% females; 70–74 in Hurlstone Park: 1.8% males, 2.7% females
- 65–69 in Ashbury: 2.6% males, 3.0% females; 65–69 in Hurlstone Park: 2.8% males, 2.6% females
- 60–64 in Ashbury: 3.1% males, 2.9% females; 60–64 in Hurlstone Park: 2.7% males, 3.0% females
- 55–59 in Ashbury: 4.0% males, 4.5% females; 55–59 in Hurlstone Park: 3.4% males, 3.8% females
- 50–54 in Ashbury: 3.7% males, 4.7% females; 50–54 in Hurlstone Park: 3.1% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Ashbury: 3.1% males, 4.1% females; 45–49 in Hurlstone Park: 3.1% males, 3.7% females
- 40–44 in Ashbury: 3.5% males, 3.0% females; 40–44 in Hurlstone Park: 3.6% males, 4.0% females
- 35–39 in Ashbury: 2.9% males, 2.6% females; 35–39 in Hurlstone Park: 3.5% males, 4.1% females
- 30–34 in Ashbury: 2.2% males, 2.1% females; 30–34 in Hurlstone Park: 4.1% males, 3.7% females
- 25–29 in Ashbury: 2.0% males, 1.7% females; 25–29 in Hurlstone Park: 3.6% males, 3.0% females
- 20–24 in Ashbury: 3.5% males, 2.5% females; 20–24 in Hurlstone Park: 2.7% males, 2.3% females
- 15–19 in Ashbury: 4.1% males, 3.4% females; 15–19 in Hurlstone Park: 2.4% males, 2.2% females
- 10–14 in Ashbury: 3.4% males, 4.0% females; 10–14 in Hurlstone Park: 2.6% males, 2.7% females
- 5–9 in Ashbury: 3.5% males, 2.3% females; 5–9 in Hurlstone Park: 2.1% males, 2.6% females
- 0–4 in Ashbury: 1.9% males, 2.0% females; 0–4 in Hurlstone Park: 2.7% males, 2.4% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $621
- First area, 2016: $743
- First area, 2021: $892
- Second area, 2011: $614
- Second area, 2016: $762
- Second area, 2021: $968
- First area, 2011: $1,693
- First area, 2016: $2,157
- First area, 2021: $2,571
- Second area, 2011: $1,492
- Second area, 2016: $1,780
- Second area, 2021: $2,121
- First area, 2011: $1,921
- First area, 2016: $2,324
- First area, 2021: $2,869
- Second area, 2011: $1,722
- Second area, 2016: $2,051
- Second area, 2021: $2,573
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.0
- First area, 2016: 3.1
- First area, 2021: 2.9
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $443
- First area, 2016: $560
- First area, 2021: $600
- Second area, 2011: $340
- Second area, 2016: $415
- Second area, 2021: $460
- First area, 2011: $2,500
- First area, 2016: $2,500
- First area, 2021: $2,817
- Second area, 2011: $2,058
- Second area, 2016: $2,299
- Second area, 2021: $2,600
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Ashbury with nearby areas
Compare Hurlstone Park with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Ashbury vs Hurlstone Park [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10094/ashbury/vs/SAL11970/hurlstone-park