Compare
Canterbury vs Hurlstone Park
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 1.3 km apart · Canterbury profile · Hurlstone Park profile
Canterbury Hurlstone Park
Canterbury and Hurlstone Park are neighbouring areas with very different residential profiles. Canterbury is much younger, with a typical age of 34, while Hurlstone Park is far older at 42. The two areas also differ in their diversity and housing; Canterbury has a far higher share of people born overseas (52.3%) and those using another language at home (56.7%). In contrast, Hurlstone Park has far more separate houses (53.4%) and a higher share of households earning $3,000 or more a week (31.9%).
These differences in housing and lifestyle are widening, most notably with people working from home far more in Hurlstone Park. Despite this, the areas share many daily realities. They have the same typical weekly rent of around $460 to $470, the same number of people per home, and both are about 14 minutes from the city. They also have similar shares of children under 15, sitting around 15%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 6,159
- First area, 2016: 7,233
- First area, 2021: 9,430
- Second area, 2011: 4,692
- Second area, 2016: 4,692
- Second area, 2021: 5,001
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 35 yrs
- First area, 2021: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 42 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Canterbury: 0.6% males, 0.8% females; 85+ in Hurlstone Park: 1.4% males, 1.2% females
- 80–84 in Canterbury: 0.6% males, 1.0% females; 80–84 in Hurlstone Park: 1.3% males, 1.8% females
- 75–79 in Canterbury: 1.0% males, 1.0% females; 75–79 in Hurlstone Park: 1.7% males, 1.9% females
- 70–74 in Canterbury: 1.3% males, 1.4% females; 70–74 in Hurlstone Park: 1.8% males, 2.7% females
- 65–69 in Canterbury: 1.6% males, 1.7% females; 65–69 in Hurlstone Park: 2.8% males, 2.6% females
- 60–64 in Canterbury: 1.9% males, 2.2% females; 60–64 in Hurlstone Park: 2.7% males, 3.0% females
- 55–59 in Canterbury: 2.6% males, 2.9% females; 55–59 in Hurlstone Park: 3.4% males, 3.8% females
- 50–54 in Canterbury: 2.4% males, 3.0% females; 50–54 in Hurlstone Park: 3.1% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Canterbury: 3.0% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Hurlstone Park: 3.1% males, 3.7% females
- 40–44 in Canterbury: 3.2% males, 3.4% females; 40–44 in Hurlstone Park: 3.6% males, 4.0% females
- 35–39 in Canterbury: 5.5% males, 5.0% females; 35–39 in Hurlstone Park: 3.5% males, 4.1% females
- 30–34 in Canterbury: 6.4% males, 6.5% females; 30–34 in Hurlstone Park: 4.1% males, 3.7% females
- 25–29 in Canterbury: 5.9% males, 6.0% females; 25–29 in Hurlstone Park: 3.6% males, 3.0% females
- 20–24 in Canterbury: 3.7% males, 3.5% females; 20–24 in Hurlstone Park: 2.7% males, 2.3% females
- 15–19 in Canterbury: 2.2% males, 2.0% females; 15–19 in Hurlstone Park: 2.4% males, 2.2% females
- 10–14 in Canterbury: 2.0% males, 2.0% females; 10–14 in Hurlstone Park: 2.6% males, 2.7% females
- 5–9 in Canterbury: 2.3% males, 2.2% females; 5–9 in Hurlstone Park: 2.1% males, 2.6% females
- 0–4 in Canterbury: 3.2% males, 2.9% females; 0–4 in Hurlstone Park: 2.7% males, 2.4% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $527
- First area, 2016: $666
- First area, 2021: $852
- Second area, 2011: $614
- Second area, 2016: $762
- Second area, 2021: $968
- First area, 2011: $1,229
- First area, 2016: $1,503
- First area, 2021: $1,882
- Second area, 2011: $1,492
- Second area, 2016: $1,780
- Second area, 2021: $2,121
- First area, 2011: $1,329
- First area, 2016: $1,627
- First area, 2021: $2,101
- Second area, 2011: $1,722
- Second area, 2016: $2,051
- Second area, 2021: $2,573
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.6
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $330
- First area, 2016: $450
- First area, 2021: $470
- Second area, 2011: $340
- Second area, 2016: $415
- Second area, 2021: $460
- First area, 2011: $2,150
- First area, 2016: $2,167
- First area, 2021: $2,200
- Second area, 2011: $2,058
- Second area, 2016: $2,299
- Second area, 2021: $2,600
- First area, 2011: 1.30
- First area, 2016: 1.10
- First area, 2021: 1.10
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Canterbury with nearby areas
Compare Hurlstone Park with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Canterbury vs Hurlstone Park [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL10796/canterbury/vs/SAL11970/hurlstone-park