Compare
Hume vs Latrobe - Gippsland
Region (SA4) comparison ≈ 123 km apart · Hume profile · Latrobe - Gippsland profile
Hume Latrobe - Gippsland
Latrobe - Gippsland and Hume are two large Victorian regions with distinct profiles. Latrobe - Gippsland is far larger in population, with 313,733 people, and has a far larger number of public transport stops and more frequent departures. In contrast, Hume is more walkable for its residents; it has a well higher share of homes within a 15-minute walk of health services (38.3% compared to 30.7%) and groceries. Hume also has a higher share of adults working or looking for work, and a higher rate of First Nations residents completing Year 12 (37.2% versus 32.4%).
These two areas have tracked similarly since 2011, with most gaps remaining steady. They share a very similar demographic makeup, including nearly identical proportions of children under 15 and people who use another language at home. Both regions have a high share of people with no religion, which is well above the national figure. However, the gap in recent overseas arrivals has widened, with Hume now seeing a well higher share of new arrivals than Latrobe - Gippsland.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 159,294
- First area, 2016: 170,194
- First area, 2021: 184,935
- Second area, 2011: 255,858
- Second area, 2016: 271,416
- Second area, 2021: 300,848
- First area, 2011: 42 yrs
- First area, 2016: 44 yrs
- First area, 2021: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 46 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Hume: 1.1% males, 1.7% females; 85+ in Latrobe - Gippsland: 1.1% males, 1.6% females
- 80–84 in Hume: 1.4% males, 1.5% females; 80–84 in Latrobe - Gippsland: 1.4% males, 1.6% females
- 75–79 in Hume: 2.2% males, 2.3% females; 75–79 in Latrobe - Gippsland: 2.3% males, 2.4% females
- 70–74 in Hume: 3.2% males, 3.2% females; 70–74 in Latrobe - Gippsland: 3.5% males, 3.4% females
- 65–69 in Hume: 3.6% males, 3.5% females; 65–69 in Latrobe - Gippsland: 3.7% males, 3.8% females
- 60–64 in Hume: 3.6% males, 3.9% females; 60–64 in Latrobe - Gippsland: 3.7% males, 4.0% females
- 55–59 in Hume: 3.4% males, 3.6% females; 55–59 in Latrobe - Gippsland: 3.3% males, 3.6% females
- 50–54 in Hume: 3.2% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Latrobe - Gippsland: 3.0% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Hume: 2.9% males, 3.2% females; 45–49 in Latrobe - Gippsland: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 40–44 in Hume: 2.7% males, 2.9% females; 40–44 in Latrobe - Gippsland: 2.5% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Hume: 2.7% males, 2.9% females; 35–39 in Latrobe - Gippsland: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 30–34 in Hume: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 30–34 in Latrobe - Gippsland: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 25–29 in Hume: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 25–29 in Latrobe - Gippsland: 2.6% males, 2.7% females
- 20–24 in Hume: 2.5% males, 2.2% females; 20–24 in Latrobe - Gippsland: 2.3% males, 2.2% females
- 15–19 in Hume: 3.0% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Latrobe - Gippsland: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
- 10–14 in Hume: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 10–14 in Latrobe - Gippsland: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
- 5–9 in Hume: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Latrobe - Gippsland: 3.0% males, 2.8% females
- 0–4 in Hume: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 0–4 in Latrobe - Gippsland: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $507
- First area, 2016: $599
- First area, 2021: $734
- Second area, 2011: $473
- Second area, 2016: $540
- Second area, 2021: $653
- First area, 2011: $942
- First area, 2016: $1,124
- First area, 2021: $1,373
- Second area, 2011: $908
- Second area, 2016: $1,048
- Second area, 2021: $1,260
- First area, 2011: $1,192
- First area, 2016: $1,417
- First area, 2021: $1,798
- Second area, 2011: $1,155
- Second area, 2016: $1,338
- Second area, 2021: $1,636
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $185
- First area, 2016: $225
- First area, 2021: $275
- Second area, 2011: $180
- Second area, 2016: $220
- Second area, 2021: $270
- First area, 2011: $1,300
- First area, 2016: $1,300
- First area, 2021: $1,430
- Second area, 2011: $1,300
- Second area, 2016: $1,300
- Second area, 2021: $1,343
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Hume with nearby areas
Compare Latrobe - Gippsland with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Hume vs Latrobe - Gippsland [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa4/204/hume/vs/205/latrobe-gippsland