Compare
Central Highlands vs Burnie - Ulverstone
Sub-region (SA3) comparison ≈ 132 km apart · Central Highlands profile · Burnie - Ulverstone profile
Central Highlands Burnie - Ulverstone
Burnie - Ulverstone and Central Highlands (Tas.) are two very different Tasmanian regions. Burnie - Ulverstone is a more developed area where 56.9% of homes are in a 15-minute-city walkshed, while Central Highlands (Tas.) is car-dependent with only 14.3% of homes having that same access. Public transport is far more common in Burnie - Ulverstone, which has 5.64 stops per 1,000 people compared to just 1.21 in Central Highlands (Tas.). The difference in infrastructure is also seen in the schools; Burnie - Ulverstone has a far larger number of schools (28) and larger average school sizes (301) than Central Highlands (Tas.), where there are only 7 schools with a typical size of 136.
The gap in rental rates has widened since 2011, with Burnie - Ulverstone now far higher at 27.0% compared to 13.0% in Central Highlands (Tas.). Despite this, the two areas share a very similar profile in other ways. They have the same typical resident age of 45 and nearly identical proportions of children under 15. Typical weekly personal incomes are also almost the same, sitting at $630 in Burnie - Ulverstone and $636 in Central Highlands (Tas.).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 11,339
- First area, 2016: 11,224
- First area, 2021: 12,440
- Second area, 2011: 47,968
- Second area, 2016: 47,530
- Second area, 2021: 50,028
- First area, 2011: 42 yrs
- First area, 2016: 45 yrs
- First area, 2021: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 45 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Central Highlands: 0.6% males, 0.6% females; 85+ in Burnie - Ulverstone: 1.1% males, 1.7% females
- 80–84 in Central Highlands: 1.0% males, 0.8% females; 80–84 in Burnie - Ulverstone: 1.4% males, 1.7% females
- 75–79 in Central Highlands: 2.1% males, 1.4% females; 75–79 in Burnie - Ulverstone: 2.1% males, 2.4% females
- 70–74 in Central Highlands: 3.5% males, 2.8% females; 70–74 in Burnie - Ulverstone: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 65–69 in Central Highlands: 3.8% males, 3.1% females; 65–69 in Burnie - Ulverstone: 3.2% males, 3.5% females
- 60–64 in Central Highlands: 4.5% males, 3.9% females; 60–64 in Burnie - Ulverstone: 3.5% males, 3.8% females
- 55–59 in Central Highlands: 4.5% males, 4.0% females; 55–59 in Burnie - Ulverstone: 3.5% males, 3.8% females
- 50–54 in Central Highlands: 3.7% males, 3.9% females; 50–54 in Burnie - Ulverstone: 3.1% males, 3.6% females
- 45–49 in Central Highlands: 3.4% males, 2.9% females; 45–49 in Burnie - Ulverstone: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Central Highlands: 3.0% males, 3.0% females; 40–44 in Burnie - Ulverstone: 2.4% males, 2.8% females
- 35–39 in Central Highlands: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 35–39 in Burnie - Ulverstone: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 30–34 in Central Highlands: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 30–34 in Burnie - Ulverstone: 2.5% males, 2.8% females
- 25–29 in Central Highlands: 2.4% males, 2.4% females; 25–29 in Burnie - Ulverstone: 2.8% males, 2.9% females
- 20–24 in Central Highlands: 2.8% males, 2.5% females; 20–24 in Burnie - Ulverstone: 2.7% males, 2.7% females
- 15–19 in Central Highlands: 3.2% males, 2.8% females; 15–19 in Burnie - Ulverstone: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
- 10–14 in Central Highlands: 3.2% males, 2.9% females; 10–14 in Burnie - Ulverstone: 3.1% males, 3.0% females
- 5–9 in Central Highlands: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Burnie - Ulverstone: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
- 0–4 in Central Highlands: 2.6% males, 2.3% females; 0–4 in Burnie - Ulverstone: 2.6% males, 2.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $418
- First area, 2016: $509
- First area, 2021: $636
- Second area, 2011: $440
- Second area, 2016: $515
- Second area, 2021: $630
- First area, 2011: $856
- First area, 2016: $1,002
- First area, 2021: $1,267
- Second area, 2011: $836
- Second area, 2016: $964
- Second area, 2021: $1,170
- First area, 2011: $1,022
- First area, 2016: $1,247
- First area, 2021: $1,562
- Second area, 2011: $1,067
- Second area, 2016: $1,263
- Second area, 2021: $1,540
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $120
- First area, 2016: $151
- First area, 2021: $240
- Second area, 2011: $175
- Second area, 2016: $200
- Second area, 2021: $240
- First area, 2011: $1,118
- First area, 2016: $1,100
- First area, 2021: $1,200
- Second area, 2011: $1,183
- Second area, 2016: $1,148
- Second area, 2021: $1,200
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Central Highlands with nearby areas
Compare Burnie - Ulverstone with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Central Highlands vs Burnie - Ulverstone [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa3/60301/central-highlands/vs/60401/burnie-ulverstone