Compare
Port Stephens vs Kempsey - Nambucca
Sub-region (SA3) comparison ≈ 226 km apart · Port Stephens profile · Kempsey - Nambucca profile
Port Stephens Kempsey - Nambucca
Kempsey - Nambucca and Port Stephens are both regional New South Wales areas with similar age profiles, but they differ in wealth and infrastructure. Port Stephens is wealthier, with a typical weekly household income of $1,338 compared to $1,037 in Kempsey - Nambucca. Port Stephens also has far better transport links, with 986.2 weekly public transport departures per 1,000 people, while Kempsey - Nambucca has only 115.9. However, Kempsey - Nambucca has a larger Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population at 10.9%, and residents there are more likely to live within a 15-minute walk of health services (38.4% compared to 24.8% in Port Stephens).
Since 2011, the two areas have tracked in different directions regarding income and household types. The gap in typical household income has widened, while the difference in the number of one-parent families has narrowed. Despite these trends, they remain very similar in other ways. Both have about 27% of their population aged 65 and over, and they share nearly identical rates for volunteering and people living with long-term health conditions. Most homes in both areas are separate houses, and the typical number of people per home is about 2.3.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 67,503
- First area, 2016: 71,381
- First area, 2021: 76,414
- Second area, 2011: 46,828
- Second area, 2016: 48,127
- Second area, 2021: 51,154
- First area, 2011: 43 yrs
- First area, 2016: 45 yrs
- First area, 2021: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 49 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 49 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Port Stephens: 1.1% males, 1.6% females; 85+ in Kempsey - Nambucca: 1.2% males, 1.9% females
- 80–84 in Port Stephens: 1.7% males, 1.7% females; 80–84 in Kempsey - Nambucca: 1.6% males, 1.7% females
- 75–79 in Port Stephens: 2.9% males, 2.9% females; 75–79 in Kempsey - Nambucca: 2.6% males, 2.6% females
- 70–74 in Port Stephens: 3.8% males, 3.8% females; 70–74 in Kempsey - Nambucca: 4.0% males, 3.7% females
- 65–69 in Port Stephens: 3.7% males, 4.0% females; 65–69 in Kempsey - Nambucca: 4.2% males, 4.1% females
- 60–64 in Port Stephens: 3.7% males, 4.0% females; 60–64 in Kempsey - Nambucca: 4.2% males, 4.4% females
- 55–59 in Port Stephens: 3.5% males, 3.6% females; 55–59 in Kempsey - Nambucca: 3.6% males, 3.9% females
- 50–54 in Port Stephens: 3.0% males, 3.2% females; 50–54 in Kempsey - Nambucca: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 45–49 in Port Stephens: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Kempsey - Nambucca: 2.6% males, 2.8% females
- 40–44 in Port Stephens: 2.4% males, 2.7% females; 40–44 in Kempsey - Nambucca: 2.3% males, 2.5% females
- 35–39 in Port Stephens: 2.4% males, 2.5% females; 35–39 in Kempsey - Nambucca: 2.3% males, 2.4% females
- 30–34 in Port Stephens: 2.3% males, 2.4% females; 30–34 in Kempsey - Nambucca: 2.3% males, 2.4% females
- 25–29 in Port Stephens: 2.2% males, 2.1% females; 25–29 in Kempsey - Nambucca: 2.4% males, 2.2% females
- 20–24 in Port Stephens: 2.4% males, 2.2% females; 20–24 in Kempsey - Nambucca: 2.3% males, 1.9% females
- 15–19 in Port Stephens: 3.0% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Kempsey - Nambucca: 2.8% males, 2.6% females
- 10–14 in Port Stephens: 3.2% males, 3.0% females; 10–14 in Kempsey - Nambucca: 3.0% males, 3.0% females
- 5–9 in Port Stephens: 2.9% males, 2.7% females; 5–9 in Kempsey - Nambucca: 2.6% males, 2.6% females
- 0–4 in Port Stephens: 2.3% males, 2.3% females; 0–4 in Kempsey - Nambucca: 2.5% males, 2.4% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $493
- First area, 2016: $563
- First area, 2021: $657
- Second area, 2011: $382
- Second area, 2016: $471
- Second area, 2021: $539
- First area, 2011: $979
- First area, 2016: $1,158
- First area, 2021: $1,338
- Second area, 2011: $727
- Second area, 2016: $869
- Second area, 2021: $1,037
- First area, 2011: $1,212
- First area, 2016: $1,402
- First area, 2021: $1,646
- Second area, 2011: $880
- Second area, 2016: $1,096
- Second area, 2021: $1,331
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $250
- First area, 2016: $300
- First area, 2021: $360
- Second area, 2011: $190
- Second area, 2016: $243
- Second area, 2021: $300
- First area, 2011: $1,700
- First area, 2016: $1,690
- First area, 2021: $1,733
- Second area, 2011: $1,291
- Second area, 2016: $1,300
- Second area, 2021: $1,330
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Port Stephens with nearby areas
Compare Kempsey - Nambucca with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Port Stephens vs Kempsey - Nambucca [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa3/10603/port-stephens/vs/10802/kempsey-nambucca