Compare
Lower Hunter vs Hawkesbury
Sub-region (SA3) comparison ≈ 66 km apart · Lower Hunter profile · Hawkesbury profile
Lower Hunter Hawkesbury
Lower Hunter and Hawkesbury are both large New South Wales regions with distinct profiles. Lower Hunter is more connected, with far more homes within a 15-minute walk of parks, schools, and groceries. It also has a much higher proportion of renters, at 25.3% compared to 11.5% in Hawkesbury. In contrast, Hawkesbury has a wealthier profile, with a typical weekly household income of $2,230, which is well higher than the $1,604 seen in Lower Hunter. Hawkesbury also has a higher share of university graduates and more people working from home (27.0% versus 13.7%).
Daily life in both areas shares several commonalities, including similar proportions of seniors and people providing unpaid care. They also have nearly identical rates of public transport use and similar weather. However, the gaps between them are often widening. For example, the difference in typical household incomes has grown since 2011, and Hawkesbury has seen a much faster increase in the number of people working from home compared to Lower Hunter.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 81,987
- First area, 2016: 87,675
- First area, 2021: 97,927
- Second area, 2011: 24,074
- Second area, 2016: 24,588
- Second area, 2021: 25,006
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 38 yrs
- First area, 2021: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Lower Hunter: 0.6% males, 1.1% females; 85+ in Hawkesbury: 0.6% males, 0.7% females
- 80–84 in Lower Hunter: 0.9% males, 1.0% females; 80–84 in Hawkesbury: 0.8% males, 0.8% females
- 75–79 in Lower Hunter: 1.5% males, 1.5% females; 75–79 in Hawkesbury: 1.6% males, 1.6% females
- 70–74 in Lower Hunter: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 70–74 in Hawkesbury: 2.4% males, 2.3% females
- 65–69 in Lower Hunter: 2.8% males, 2.7% females; 65–69 in Hawkesbury: 2.8% males, 2.6% females
- 60–64 in Lower Hunter: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 60–64 in Hawkesbury: 3.6% males, 3.5% females
- 55–59 in Lower Hunter: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 55–59 in Hawkesbury: 3.7% males, 3.8% females
- 50–54 in Lower Hunter: 3.3% males, 3.2% females; 50–54 in Hawkesbury: 3.9% males, 3.9% females
- 45–49 in Lower Hunter: 3.0% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Hawkesbury: 3.4% males, 3.8% females
- 40–44 in Lower Hunter: 3.0% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Hawkesbury: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
- 35–39 in Lower Hunter: 3.2% males, 3.3% females; 35–39 in Hawkesbury: 2.8% males, 2.8% females
- 30–34 in Lower Hunter: 3.4% males, 3.4% females; 30–34 in Hawkesbury: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
- 25–29 in Lower Hunter: 3.4% males, 3.3% females; 25–29 in Hawkesbury: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
- 20–24 in Lower Hunter: 3.1% males, 2.8% females; 20–24 in Hawkesbury: 3.2% males, 2.8% females
- 15–19 in Lower Hunter: 3.3% males, 2.9% females; 15–19 in Hawkesbury: 3.6% males, 3.3% females
- 10–14 in Lower Hunter: 3.5% males, 3.3% females; 10–14 in Hawkesbury: 3.5% males, 3.3% females
- 5–9 in Lower Hunter: 3.5% males, 3.3% females; 5–9 in Hawkesbury: 3.4% males, 2.9% females
- 0–4 in Lower Hunter: 3.3% males, 3.1% females; 0–4 in Hawkesbury: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $511
- First area, 2016: $578
- First area, 2021: $727
- Second area, 2011: $641
- Second area, 2016: $762
- Second area, 2021: $889
- First area, 2011: $1,182
- First area, 2016: $1,284
- First area, 2021: $1,604
- Second area, 2011: $1,575
- Second area, 2016: $1,890
- Second area, 2021: $2,230
- First area, 2011: $1,416
- First area, 2016: $1,543
- First area, 2021: $1,941
- Second area, 2011: $1,722
- Second area, 2016: $2,038
- Second area, 2021: $2,375
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 3.0
- Second area, 2016: 3.0
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $235
- First area, 2016: $280
- First area, 2021: $340
- Second area, 2011: $270
- Second area, 2016: $360
- Second area, 2021: $430
- First area, 2011: $1,700
- First area, 2016: $1,625
- First area, 2021: $1,733
- Second area, 2011: $2,156
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $2,308
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Lower Hunter with nearby areas
Compare Hawkesbury with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Lower Hunter vs Hawkesbury [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa3/10601/lower-hunter/vs/11503/hawkesbury