Compare
Hawkesbury vs Blue Mountains
Sub-region (SA3) comparison ≈ 51 km apart · Hawkesbury profile · Blue Mountains profile
Hawkesbury Blue Mountains
Blue Mountains and Hawkesbury are two distinct New South Wales regions with different social and physical layouts. Blue Mountains is more urbanised and accessible, with a walkability score of 5.5 (somewhat walkable) and 60.2% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a city centre. It also has a more highly qualified population; 32.6% of adults hold a bachelor degree or higher, compared to 17.3% in Hawkesbury. In contrast, Hawkesbury is more car-dependent, with a score of 1.7, and has a higher share of high-income earners, as 31.0% of households earn $3,000 or more per week compared to 23.9% in Blue Mountains.
Everyday life shares some similarities across both areas, such as typical weekly rents which sit at $400 in Blue Mountains and $430 in Hawkesbury. However, some gaps are widening. The typical resident in Blue Mountains is now 4 years older than those in Hawkesbury, a gap that has grown since 2011. This trend is also seen in education, where the gap in Year 12 completion has increased to 16 points, and in the share of people with no religion, which is now 11 points higher in Blue Mountains.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 24,074
- First area, 2016: 24,588
- First area, 2021: 25,006
- Second area, 2011: 75,697
- Second area, 2016: 76,694
- Second area, 2021: 77,950
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 45 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Hawkesbury: 0.6% males, 0.7% females; 85+ in Blue Mountains: 0.8% males, 1.4% females
- 80–84 in Hawkesbury: 0.8% males, 0.8% females; 80–84 in Blue Mountains: 1.1% males, 1.4% females
- 75–79 in Hawkesbury: 1.6% males, 1.6% females; 75–79 in Blue Mountains: 1.9% males, 2.3% females
- 70–74 in Hawkesbury: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 70–74 in Blue Mountains: 3.0% males, 3.3% females
- 65–69 in Hawkesbury: 2.8% males, 2.6% females; 65–69 in Blue Mountains: 3.4% males, 3.7% females
- 60–64 in Hawkesbury: 3.6% males, 3.5% females; 60–64 in Blue Mountains: 3.5% males, 4.0% females
- 55–59 in Hawkesbury: 3.7% males, 3.8% females; 55–59 in Blue Mountains: 3.2% males, 3.7% females
- 50–54 in Hawkesbury: 3.9% males, 3.9% females; 50–54 in Blue Mountains: 3.4% males, 3.6% females
- 45–49 in Hawkesbury: 3.4% males, 3.8% females; 45–49 in Blue Mountains: 3.4% males, 3.7% females
- 40–44 in Hawkesbury: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Blue Mountains: 3.0% males, 3.3% females
- 35–39 in Hawkesbury: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 35–39 in Blue Mountains: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 30–34 in Hawkesbury: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 30–34 in Blue Mountains: 2.5% males, 2.7% females
- 25–29 in Hawkesbury: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 25–29 in Blue Mountains: 2.0% males, 2.0% females
- 20–24 in Hawkesbury: 3.2% males, 2.8% females; 20–24 in Blue Mountains: 2.4% males, 2.0% females
- 15–19 in Hawkesbury: 3.6% males, 3.3% females; 15–19 in Blue Mountains: 3.2% males, 2.8% females
- 10–14 in Hawkesbury: 3.5% males, 3.3% females; 10–14 in Blue Mountains: 3.3% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Hawkesbury: 3.4% males, 2.9% females; 5–9 in Blue Mountains: 3.1% males, 3.0% females
- 0–4 in Hawkesbury: 2.9% males, 2.9% females; 0–4 in Blue Mountains: 2.5% males, 2.4% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $641
- First area, 2016: $762
- First area, 2021: $889
- Second area, 2011: $590
- Second area, 2016: $689
- Second area, 2021: $817
- First area, 2011: $1,575
- First area, 2016: $1,890
- First area, 2021: $2,230
- Second area, 2011: $1,270
- Second area, 2016: $1,468
- Second area, 2021: $1,756
- First area, 2011: $1,722
- First area, 2016: $2,038
- First area, 2021: $2,375
- Second area, 2011: $1,623
- Second area, 2016: $1,866
- Second area, 2021: $2,235
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.0
- First area, 2016: 3.0
- First area, 2021: 2.9
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $270
- First area, 2016: $360
- First area, 2021: $430
- Second area, 2011: $280
- Second area, 2016: $350
- Second area, 2021: $400
- First area, 2011: $2,156
- First area, 2016: $2,167
- First area, 2021: $2,308
- Second area, 2011: $1,842
- Second area, 2016: $1,842
- Second area, 2021: $2,033
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Hawkesbury with nearby areas
Compare Blue Mountains with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Hawkesbury vs Blue Mountains [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa3/11503/hawkesbury/vs/12401/blue-mountains