Lower Hunter · Sub-region (SA3)

Walkability in Lower Hunter

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

Only 16% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of health services in Lower Hunter, a massive gap compared to the state. This area is mostly car-dependent, with just 33% of households able to reach a variety of daily needs on foot. Most residents will need a vehicle for basic errands.

Open map →
📍 Lower Hunter, Sub-region (SA3)

Where Lower Hunter sits — Walkability score

3.3 Mostly car-dependent
  • 0.0–0.4: 2 areas
  • 0.4–0.7: 2 areas
  • 0.7–1.1: 3 areas
  • 1.1–1.4: 2 areas
  • 1.4–1.8: 3 areas
  • 1.8–2.1: 10 areas
  • 2.1–2.5: 10 areas
  • 2.5–2.9: 16 areas
  • 2.9–3.2: 17 areas
  • 3.2–3.6: 17 areas
  • 3.6–3.9: 30 areas
  • 3.9–4.3: 13 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 25 areas
  • 4.6–5.0: 23 areas
  • 5.0–5.4: 16 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 15 areas
  • 5.7–6.1: 14 areas
  • 6.1–6.4: 15 areas
  • 6.4–6.8: 18 areas
  • 6.8–7.1: 15 areas
  • 7.1–7.5: 15 areas
  • 7.5–7.9: 17 areas
  • 7.9–8.2: 13 areas
  • 8.2–8.6: 12 areas
  • 8.6–8.9: 8 areas
  • 8.9–9.3: 6 areas
  • 9.3–9.6: 4 areas
  • 9.6–10.0: 1 area

All sub-region (sa3) areas, 2021. The marker is Lower Hunter — mostly car-dependent of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
Lower Hunter3.3
Rest of NSW 4.6
New South Wales 6.2

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Lower Hunter by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

The walkability score for Lower Hunter is 3.3, which means it is mostly car-dependent. This is far below the New South Wales figure of 6.2, and only 3.2 types of amenities are typically found within a 15-minute walk.

3.3

Mostly car-dependent of sub-region (sa3) areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

3.2

Lower than 83% of sub-region (sa3) areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

33.0%

Lower than 86% of sub-region (sa3) areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Public transport and parks are the easiest to reach, with 60.5% of homes near transport and 69.5% near a park. In contrast, access to essentials is much lower, as only 24.5% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

The average terrain slope is 6.4%, which is about the same as the state average. There is one intersection per square kilometre, and there are 11.8 walkable amenities per 1,000 residents, a little below the New South Wales figure.

11.8

Lower than 78% of sub-region (sa3) areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

6.4%

Higher than 67% of sub-region (sa3) areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Lower Hunter

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Lower Hunter [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/sa3/10601/lower-hunter/topic/walkability