Compare
Lower Hunter vs Great Lakes
Sub-region (SA3) comparison ≈ 108 km apart · Lower Hunter profile · Great Lakes profile
Lower Hunter Great Lakes
Great Lakes and Lower Hunter are distinct New South Wales regions with very different populations. Great Lakes is a much older area, where the typical resident is 56 and a far higher share of people are aged 65 and over (35.8%). This age profile is reflected in the housing and economy, as 49.6% of homes are owned outright and far fewer adults are working or looking for work (42.6%) compared to Lower Hunter. In contrast, Lower Hunter has a younger population with a typical age of 38 and a much higher share of children under 15 (20.1%). This area has more large homes, with 81.3% having three or more bedrooms, and higher typical weekly household incomes of $1,604.
Both areas share a similar experience in some parts of daily life, such as the typical weekly rent and the share of people working from home. They also both have roughly 70% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a park. However, the gaps between them are often widening. The age difference has grown as Great Lakes has become older, and the gap in typical incomes has increased since 2011.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 81,987
- First area, 2016: 87,675
- First area, 2021: 97,927
- Second area, 2011: 29,848
- Second area, 2016: 31,272
- Second area, 2021: 33,311
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 38 yrs
- First area, 2021: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 51 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 54 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 56 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Lower Hunter: 0.6% males, 1.1% females; 85+ in Great Lakes: 1.9% males, 2.9% females
- 80–84 in Lower Hunter: 0.9% males, 1.0% females; 80–84 in Great Lakes: 2.3% males, 2.5% females
- 75–79 in Lower Hunter: 1.5% males, 1.5% females; 75–79 in Great Lakes: 3.6% males, 3.6% females
- 70–74 in Lower Hunter: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 70–74 in Great Lakes: 4.8% males, 4.8% females
- 65–69 in Lower Hunter: 2.8% males, 2.7% females; 65–69 in Great Lakes: 4.6% males, 4.9% females
- 60–64 in Lower Hunter: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 60–64 in Great Lakes: 4.2% males, 4.7% females
- 55–59 in Lower Hunter: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 55–59 in Great Lakes: 3.4% males, 3.7% females
- 50–54 in Lower Hunter: 3.3% males, 3.2% females; 50–54 in Great Lakes: 3.0% males, 3.1% females
- 45–49 in Lower Hunter: 3.0% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Great Lakes: 2.6% males, 2.7% females
- 40–44 in Lower Hunter: 3.0% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Great Lakes: 2.0% males, 2.4% females
- 35–39 in Lower Hunter: 3.2% males, 3.3% females; 35–39 in Great Lakes: 2.0% males, 2.1% females
- 30–34 in Lower Hunter: 3.4% males, 3.4% females; 30–34 in Great Lakes: 1.7% males, 2.1% females
- 25–29 in Lower Hunter: 3.4% males, 3.3% females; 25–29 in Great Lakes: 1.6% males, 1.7% females
- 20–24 in Lower Hunter: 3.1% males, 2.8% females; 20–24 in Great Lakes: 1.7% males, 1.5% females
- 15–19 in Lower Hunter: 3.3% males, 2.9% females; 15–19 in Great Lakes: 2.3% males, 2.2% females
- 10–14 in Lower Hunter: 3.5% males, 3.3% females; 10–14 in Great Lakes: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
- 5–9 in Lower Hunter: 3.5% males, 3.3% females; 5–9 in Great Lakes: 2.2% males, 2.3% females
- 0–4 in Lower Hunter: 3.3% males, 3.1% females; 0–4 in Great Lakes: 1.8% males, 1.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $511
- First area, 2016: $578
- First area, 2021: $727
- Second area, 2011: $393
- Second area, 2016: $476
- Second area, 2021: $561
- First area, 2011: $1,182
- First area, 2016: $1,284
- First area, 2021: $1,604
- Second area, 2011: $725
- Second area, 2016: $855
- Second area, 2021: $1,014
- First area, 2011: $1,416
- First area, 2016: $1,543
- First area, 2021: $1,941
- Second area, 2011: $884
- Second area, 2016: $1,079
- Second area, 2021: $1,327
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 2.2
- Second area, 2016: 2.2
- Second area, 2021: 2.1
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $235
- First area, 2016: $280
- First area, 2021: $340
- Second area, 2011: $200
- Second area, 2016: $260
- Second area, 2021: $330
- First area, 2011: $1,700
- First area, 2016: $1,625
- First area, 2021: $1,733
- Second area, 2011: $1,378
- Second area, 2016: $1,387
- Second area, 2021: $1,517
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Lower Hunter with nearby areas
Compare Great Lakes with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Lower Hunter vs Great Lakes [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa3/10601/lower-hunter/vs/10801/great-lakes