Compare
Banks vs Namadgi
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 22 km apart · Banks profile · Namadgi profile
Banks Namadgi
Namadgi is a sparsely populated area, while Banks is a larger residential suburb. Banks is more affluent and educated, with 66.7% of residents completing Year 12 and 17% earning over $2,000 a week. In contrast, only 44.4% of Namadgi residents finished Year 12 and none earn a weekly income above $2,000. Namadgi is also much more likely to have one-parent families (26%) and people in de facto relationships (26.5%), while Banks has a higher share of people born overseas (18.2%) and those using another language at home (14.9%).
Since 2011, the two areas have tracked in different directions across several measures. The gap in typical age has shifted, with residents now far older in Banks. Similarly, the difference in full-time employment and the number of adults working or looking for work has widened, with Banks seeing far higher rates. Despite these shifts, the two areas remain alike in their typical weekly rents, which are around $400 in Namadgi and $424 in Banks, and they share a similar typical weekly family income of about $2,700.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 5,060
- First area, 2016: 4,967
- First area, 2021: 5,100
- Second area, 2016: 42
- Second area, 2021: 63
- First area, 2011: 30 yrs
- First area, 2016: 33 yrs
- First area, 2021: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 27 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Banks: 0.3% males, 0.4% females; 85+ in Namadgi: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Banks: 0.5% males, 0.5% females; 80–84 in Namadgi: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Banks: 1.0% males, 0.7% females; 75–79 in Namadgi: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Banks: 0.8% males, 1.3% females; 70–74 in Namadgi: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 65–69 in Banks: 1.7% males, 1.4% females; 65–69 in Namadgi: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 60–64 in Banks: 2.5% males, 2.6% females; 60–64 in Namadgi: 12.3% males, 7.0% females
- 55–59 in Banks: 3.4% males, 3.1% females; 55–59 in Namadgi: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 50–54 in Banks: 3.3% males, 3.6% females; 50–54 in Namadgi: 7.0% males, 0.0% females
- 45–49 in Banks: 4.3% males, 4.0% females; 45–49 in Namadgi: 0.0% males, 5.3% females
- 40–44 in Banks: 3.2% males, 4.1% females; 40–44 in Namadgi: 7.0% males, 0.0% females
- 35–39 in Banks: 4.1% males, 3.9% females; 35–39 in Namadgi: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 30–34 in Banks: 3.5% males, 4.0% females; 30–34 in Namadgi: 7.0% males, 0.0% females
- 25–29 in Banks: 3.8% males, 3.6% females; 25–29 in Namadgi: 7.0% males, 5.3% females
- 20–24 in Banks: 3.3% males, 3.4% females; 20–24 in Namadgi: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Banks: 3.7% males, 3.3% females; 15–19 in Namadgi: 5.3% males, 0.0% females
- 10–14 in Banks: 3.7% males, 3.6% females; 10–14 in Namadgi: 7.0% males, 0.0% females
- 5–9 in Banks: 3.9% males, 3.6% females; 5–9 in Namadgi: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 0–4 in Banks: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 0–4 in Namadgi: 17.5% males, 12.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $948
- First area, 2016: $1,012
- First area, 2021: $1,168
- Second area, 2016: $1,208
- Second area, 2021: $1,270
- First area, 2011: $1,962
- First area, 2016: $2,148
- First area, 2021: $2,419
- Second area, 2016: $1,937
- Second area, 2021: $2,812
- First area, 2011: $2,126
- First area, 2016: $2,335
- First area, 2021: $2,741
- Second area, 2016: $2,374
- Second area, 2021: $2,687
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.0
- Second area, 2021: 3.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $369
- First area, 2016: $375
- First area, 2021: $424
- Second area, 2016: $130
- Second area, 2021: $400
- First area, 2011: $2,167
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $4,333
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 1.30
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Banks with nearby areas
Compare Namadgi with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Banks vs Namadgi [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/801071071/banks/vs/801111141/namadgi