Compare
Banks vs Richardson
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 5.0 km apart · Banks profile · Richardson profile
Banks Richardson
Banks and Richardson are neighbouring areas in the Australian Capital Territory with very different profiles of wealth and convenience. Banks is the more affluent of the two, with a higher share of households earning $3,000 or more a week (34.9% compared to 26.3%) and a much larger proportion of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries (90.1% versus 29.1%). In contrast, Richardson is far more dominated by separate houses, which make up 96.1% of its dwellings compared to 79.2% in Banks, and it provides much better access to schools and health services by foot.
The gap in household incomes has widened since 2011, but the two areas share a similar everyday rhythm. They are virtually identical in the number of people working from home, the proportion of people in de facto relationships, and the typical monthly home-loan payment of $2,000. Both areas also have a similar number of public transport stops, though Richardson has far more frequent departures and a higher number of people reachable by transit within 45 minutes.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 5,060
- First area, 2016: 4,967
- First area, 2021: 5,100
- Second area, 2011: 3,133
- Second area, 2016: 3,006
- Second area, 2021: 3,058
- First area, 2011: 30 yrs
- First area, 2016: 33 yrs
- First area, 2021: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 36 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Banks: 0.3% males, 0.4% females; 85+ in Richardson: 0.4% males, 0.5% females
- 80–84 in Banks: 0.5% males, 0.5% females; 80–84 in Richardson: 0.7% males, 0.5% females
- 75–79 in Banks: 1.0% males, 0.7% females; 75–79 in Richardson: 0.7% males, 0.9% females
- 70–74 in Banks: 0.8% males, 1.3% females; 70–74 in Richardson: 1.8% males, 1.8% females
- 65–69 in Banks: 1.7% males, 1.4% females; 65–69 in Richardson: 2.8% males, 2.5% females
- 60–64 in Banks: 2.5% males, 2.6% females; 60–64 in Richardson: 2.9% males, 4.2% females
- 55–59 in Banks: 3.4% males, 3.1% females; 55–59 in Richardson: 2.8% males, 2.9% females
- 50–54 in Banks: 3.3% males, 3.6% females; 50–54 in Richardson: 3.1% males, 2.7% females
- 45–49 in Banks: 4.3% males, 4.0% females; 45–49 in Richardson: 3.3% males, 4.0% females
- 40–44 in Banks: 3.2% males, 4.1% females; 40–44 in Richardson: 3.4% males, 3.1% females
- 35–39 in Banks: 4.1% males, 3.9% females; 35–39 in Richardson: 3.9% males, 3.4% females
- 30–34 in Banks: 3.5% males, 4.0% females; 30–34 in Richardson: 3.9% males, 4.1% females
- 25–29 in Banks: 3.8% males, 3.6% females; 25–29 in Richardson: 3.6% males, 3.6% females
- 20–24 in Banks: 3.3% males, 3.4% females; 20–24 in Richardson: 3.6% males, 2.2% females
- 15–19 in Banks: 3.7% males, 3.3% females; 15–19 in Richardson: 3.9% males, 2.8% females
- 10–14 in Banks: 3.7% males, 3.6% females; 10–14 in Richardson: 3.4% males, 3.7% females
- 5–9 in Banks: 3.9% males, 3.6% females; 5–9 in Richardson: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 0–4 in Banks: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 0–4 in Richardson: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $948
- First area, 2016: $1,012
- First area, 2021: $1,168
- Second area, 2011: $781
- Second area, 2016: $863
- Second area, 2021: $1,012
- First area, 2011: $1,962
- First area, 2016: $2,148
- First area, 2021: $2,419
- Second area, 2011: $1,632
- Second area, 2016: $1,840
- Second area, 2021: $2,043
- First area, 2011: $2,126
- First area, 2016: $2,335
- First area, 2021: $2,741
- Second area, 2011: $1,842
- Second area, 2016: $2,061
- Second area, 2021: $2,327
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $369
- First area, 2016: $375
- First area, 2021: $424
- Second area, 2011: $272
- Second area, 2016: $325
- Second area, 2021: $391
- First area, 2011: $2,167
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $2,000
- Second area, 2011: $1,842
- Second area, 2016: $1,900
- Second area, 2021: $2,000
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Banks with nearby areas
Compare Richardson with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Banks vs Richardson [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/801071071/banks/vs/801071087/richardson