Compare
Kingston - Robe vs Mount Gambier - West
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 138 km apart · Kingston - Robe profile · Mount Gambier - West profile
Kingston - Robe Mount Gambier - West
Mount Gambier - West and Kingston - Robe are two South Australian areas with very different layouts. Mount Gambier - West is more urban and accessible, with a walkability score of 5.4 (somewhat walkable) and a typical resident aged 41. In contrast, Kingston - Robe is mostly car-dependent, with a score of 2.7, and is far older, with a typical resident aged 53. Kingston - Robe has a much higher share of homes owned outright (47.4% compared to 30.6%) and far more detached houses, while Mount Gambier - West has a higher proportion of renters (30.9% versus 20.3%).
These areas have tracked in different directions since 2011, with the gap in typical age and home ownership both widening. Despite this, they share several core similarities, such as having almost identical typical weekly household incomes of around $1,200. Both areas also have about the same share of adults with a bachelor degree or higher, sitting around 11%. While Mount Gambier - West has far more public transport options, both places see a high level of volunteering compared to the national figure.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 3,679
- First area, 2016: 3,724
- First area, 2021: 3,872
- Second area, 2016: 14,017
- Second area, 2021: 14,499
- First area, 2011: 46 yrs
- First area, 2016: 50 yrs
- First area, 2021: 53 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Kingston - Robe: 1.5% males, 1.5% females; 85+ in Mount Gambier - West: 1.2% males, 1.6% females
- 80–84 in Kingston - Robe: 1.8% males, 2.2% females; 80–84 in Mount Gambier - West: 1.4% males, 1.9% females
- 75–79 in Kingston - Robe: 2.5% males, 2.9% females; 75–79 in Mount Gambier - West: 1.8% males, 2.3% females
- 70–74 in Kingston - Robe: 4.1% males, 4.4% females; 70–74 in Mount Gambier - West: 2.6% males, 3.1% females
- 65–69 in Kingston - Robe: 5.3% males, 4.8% females; 65–69 in Mount Gambier - West: 3.0% males, 3.1% females
- 60–64 in Kingston - Robe: 4.4% males, 4.4% females; 60–64 in Mount Gambier - West: 2.9% males, 3.4% females
- 55–59 in Kingston - Robe: 4.1% males, 4.1% females; 55–59 in Mount Gambier - West: 3.0% males, 3.3% females
- 50–54 in Kingston - Robe: 3.0% males, 2.9% females; 50–54 in Mount Gambier - West: 3.1% males, 3.2% females
- 45–49 in Kingston - Robe: 2.8% males, 2.6% females; 45–49 in Mount Gambier - West: 2.6% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Kingston - Robe: 2.3% males, 2.2% females; 40–44 in Mount Gambier - West: 2.5% males, 2.9% females
- 35–39 in Kingston - Robe: 2.5% males, 2.6% females; 35–39 in Mount Gambier - West: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
- 30–34 in Kingston - Robe: 2.4% males, 2.1% females; 30–34 in Mount Gambier - West: 3.1% males, 3.2% females
- 25–29 in Kingston - Robe: 2.2% males, 2.4% females; 25–29 in Mount Gambier - West: 2.9% males, 3.3% females
- 20–24 in Kingston - Robe: 2.0% males, 2.0% females; 20–24 in Mount Gambier - West: 2.8% males, 2.9% females
- 15–19 in Kingston - Robe: 2.2% males, 1.8% females; 15–19 in Mount Gambier - West: 3.2% males, 3.2% females
- 10–14 in Kingston - Robe: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 10–14 in Mount Gambier - West: 3.3% males, 2.9% females
- 5–9 in Kingston - Robe: 2.6% males, 2.1% females; 5–9 in Mount Gambier - West: 3.0% males, 3.0% females
- 0–4 in Kingston - Robe: 1.9% males, 2.6% females; 0–4 in Mount Gambier - West: 2.8% males, 2.8% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $507
- First area, 2016: $597
- First area, 2021: $701
- Second area, 2016: $580
- Second area, 2021: $690
- First area, 2011: $833
- First area, 2016: $1,005
- First area, 2021: $1,200
- Second area, 2016: $1,011
- Second area, 2021: $1,210
- First area, 2011: $1,011
- First area, 2016: $1,309
- First area, 2021: $1,580
- Second area, 2016: $1,365
- Second area, 2021: $1,688
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.2
- First area, 2016: 2.2
- First area, 2021: 2.1
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $134
- First area, 2016: $174
- First area, 2021: $220
- Second area, 2016: $190
- Second area, 2021: $220
- First area, 2011: $1,099
- First area, 2016: $1,083
- First area, 2021: $1,180
- Second area, 2016: $1,192
- Second area, 2021: $1,109
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Kingston - Robe with nearby areas
Compare Mount Gambier - West with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Kingston - Robe vs Mount Gambier - West [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/407021151/kingston-robe/vs/407021174/mount-gambier-west