Compare
Redcliffe vs Mango Hill
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 6.2 km apart · Redcliffe profile · Mango Hill profile
Redcliffe Mango Hill
Mango Hill and Redcliffe are neighbouring areas with very different populations. Mango Hill is a young, diverse hub where the typical resident is 31 and 27.7% of people are children under 15. It has a higher share of university degrees (27.4%) and a typical weekly household income of $2,145. Redcliffe is much older, with a typical age of 52 and a high proportion of seniors (30.7%). In Redcliffe, typical weekly household income is far lower at $1,111, and long-term health conditions are more common, affecting 41.1% of residents.
Both areas are effectively alike in their share of First Nations people and the fact that almost every home is within a 15-minute walk of a park. While Mango Hill has far more large family homes, Redcliffe has a higher share of flats and apartments. Public transport is far more accessible in Redcliffe, where there are more stops and more frequent departures. Mango Hill has seen more growth and movement recently, with 66.0% of residents having moved there in the last five years.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 9,201
- First area, 2016: 10,164
- First area, 2021: 10,434
- Second area, 2021: 14,921
- First area, 2011: 44 yrs
- First area, 2016: 48 yrs
- First area, 2021: 52 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 31 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Redcliffe: 1.5% males, 2.2% females; 85+ in Mango Hill: 0.2% males, 0.5% females
- 80–84 in Redcliffe: 1.7% males, 2.5% females; 80–84 in Mango Hill: 0.2% males, 0.2% females
- 75–79 in Redcliffe: 2.8% males, 3.0% females; 75–79 in Mango Hill: 0.4% males, 0.6% females
- 70–74 in Redcliffe: 3.7% males, 4.9% females; 70–74 in Mango Hill: 0.7% males, 0.9% females
- 65–69 in Redcliffe: 3.9% males, 4.5% females; 65–69 in Mango Hill: 1.1% males, 1.3% females
- 60–64 in Redcliffe: 3.5% males, 4.4% females; 60–64 in Mango Hill: 1.2% males, 1.4% females
- 55–59 in Redcliffe: 3.7% males, 4.0% females; 55–59 in Mango Hill: 1.7% males, 1.8% females
- 50–54 in Redcliffe: 3.5% males, 4.1% females; 50–54 in Mango Hill: 2.6% males, 2.5% females
- 45–49 in Redcliffe: 3.2% males, 3.3% females; 45–49 in Mango Hill: 3.4% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Redcliffe: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 40–44 in Mango Hill: 4.4% males, 4.4% females
- 35–39 in Redcliffe: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 35–39 in Mango Hill: 5.3% males, 5.7% females
- 30–34 in Redcliffe: 2.2% males, 2.1% females; 30–34 in Mango Hill: 4.0% males, 5.0% females
- 25–29 in Redcliffe: 1.7% males, 1.8% females; 25–29 in Mango Hill: 2.8% males, 3.7% females
- 20–24 in Redcliffe: 2.1% males, 2.0% females; 20–24 in Mango Hill: 2.8% males, 3.2% females
- 15–19 in Redcliffe: 2.7% males, 2.2% females; 15–19 in Mango Hill: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 10–14 in Redcliffe: 2.6% males, 2.3% females; 10–14 in Mango Hill: 4.4% males, 4.3% females
- 5–9 in Redcliffe: 1.8% males, 2.2% females; 5–9 in Mango Hill: 5.2% males, 4.7% females
- 0–4 in Redcliffe: 1.7% males, 1.7% females; 0–4 in Mango Hill: 4.8% males, 4.4% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $506
- First area, 2016: $564
- First area, 2021: $625
- Second area, 2021: $959
- First area, 2011: $882
- First area, 2016: $983
- First area, 2021: $1,111
- Second area, 2021: $2,145
- First area, 2011: $1,169
- First area, 2016: $1,351
- First area, 2021: $1,527
- Second area, 2021: $2,266
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.1
- First area, 2016: 2.1
- First area, 2021: 2.0
- Second area, 2021: 3.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $270
- First area, 2016: $300
- First area, 2021: $334
- Second area, 2021: $400
- First area, 2011: $1,733
- First area, 2016: $1,517
- First area, 2021: $1,600
- Second area, 2021: $2,000
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Redcliffe with nearby areas
Compare Mango Hill with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Redcliffe vs Mango Hill [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/313051379/redcliffe/vs/314021578/mango-hill