Compare
Rothwell - Kippa-Ring vs Mango Hill
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 3.6 km apart · Rothwell - Kippa-Ring profile · Mango Hill profile
Rothwell - Kippa-Ring Mango Hill
Rothwell - Kippa-Ring and Mango Hill are neighbouring areas with very different profiles. Residents are far older in Rothwell - Kippa-Ring, where the typical age is 43 and a quarter of the population is 65 or older. In contrast, Mango Hill is much younger with a typical age of 31. Mango Hill also has a far more diverse and qualified population, with 36.8% born overseas and 27.4% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher. Typical weekly incomes are also far higher in Mango Hill, where the usual household earns $2,145 compared to $1,301 in Rothwell - Kippa-Ring.
These two areas are drifting further apart, most clearly seen in their recent growth: Mango Hill's population rose by 17.5% since 2021, while Rothwell - Kippa-Ring fell by 0.8%. Despite this, they share some basic traits, such as having the same number of schools and similar average temperatures. They also both sit about 30 minutes from the city and have similar levels of volunteer work.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 16,615
- First area, 2016: 17,138
- First area, 2021: 17,385
- Second area, 2021: 14,921
- First area, 2011: 38 yrs
- First area, 2016: 41 yrs
- First area, 2021: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 31 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Rothwell - Kippa-Ring: 1.5% males, 2.8% females; 85+ in Mango Hill: 0.2% males, 0.5% females
- 80–84 in Rothwell - Kippa-Ring: 1.5% males, 2.2% females; 80–84 in Mango Hill: 0.2% males, 0.2% females
- 75–79 in Rothwell - Kippa-Ring: 2.3% males, 2.9% females; 75–79 in Mango Hill: 0.4% males, 0.6% females
- 70–74 in Rothwell - Kippa-Ring: 2.8% males, 3.2% females; 70–74 in Mango Hill: 0.7% males, 0.9% females
- 65–69 in Rothwell - Kippa-Ring: 2.3% males, 3.2% females; 65–69 in Mango Hill: 1.1% males, 1.3% females
- 60–64 in Rothwell - Kippa-Ring: 2.4% males, 3.0% females; 60–64 in Mango Hill: 1.2% males, 1.4% females
- 55–59 in Rothwell - Kippa-Ring: 2.7% males, 3.2% females; 55–59 in Mango Hill: 1.7% males, 1.8% females
- 50–54 in Rothwell - Kippa-Ring: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in Mango Hill: 2.6% males, 2.5% females
- 45–49 in Rothwell - Kippa-Ring: 2.9% males, 3.4% females; 45–49 in Mango Hill: 3.4% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Rothwell - Kippa-Ring: 2.5% males, 3.2% females; 40–44 in Mango Hill: 4.4% males, 4.4% females
- 35–39 in Rothwell - Kippa-Ring: 2.6% males, 3.1% females; 35–39 in Mango Hill: 5.3% males, 5.7% females
- 30–34 in Rothwell - Kippa-Ring: 2.7% males, 2.9% females; 30–34 in Mango Hill: 4.0% males, 5.0% females
- 25–29 in Rothwell - Kippa-Ring: 2.4% males, 2.4% females; 25–29 in Mango Hill: 2.8% males, 3.7% females
- 20–24 in Rothwell - Kippa-Ring: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 20–24 in Mango Hill: 2.8% males, 3.2% females
- 15–19 in Rothwell - Kippa-Ring: 3.3% males, 3.1% females; 15–19 in Mango Hill: 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 10–14 in Rothwell - Kippa-Ring: 3.6% males, 3.3% females; 10–14 in Mango Hill: 4.4% males, 4.3% females
- 5–9 in Rothwell - Kippa-Ring: 3.0% males, 3.2% females; 5–9 in Mango Hill: 5.2% males, 4.7% females
- 0–4 in Rothwell - Kippa-Ring: 2.5% males, 2.4% females; 0–4 in Mango Hill: 4.8% males, 4.4% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $501
- First area, 2016: $544
- First area, 2021: $634
- Second area, 2021: $959
- First area, 2011: $1,039
- First area, 2016: $1,137
- First area, 2021: $1,301
- Second area, 2021: $2,145
- First area, 2011: $1,212
- First area, 2016: $1,350
- First area, 2021: $1,612
- Second area, 2021: $2,266
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 3.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $310
- First area, 2016: $340
- First area, 2021: $360
- Second area, 2021: $400
- First area, 2011: $1,694
- First area, 2016: $1,625
- First area, 2021: $1,625
- Second area, 2021: $2,000
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Rothwell - Kippa-Ring with nearby areas
Compare Mango Hill with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Rothwell - Kippa-Ring vs Mango Hill [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/313051380/rothwell-kippa-ring/vs/314021578/mango-hill