Compare
Shoal Point - Bucasia vs Proserpine
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 95 km apart · Shoal Point - Bucasia profile · Proserpine profile
Shoal Point - Bucasia Proserpine
Proserpine and Shoal Point - Bucasia are two different types of Queensland communities. Proserpine is a much older area, with a typical resident aged 45 and 21.1% of the population aged 65 or over. It is also more likely to have homes owned outright, with 38.2% compared to 23.7% in Shoal Point - Bucasia. In contrast, Shoal Point - Bucasia is younger, with a typical resident aged 36, and has far more people moving in recently, at 45.2% compared to 34.3% in Proserpine.
Both areas sit near the national figure for overall advantage. They are also very similar in their unemployment rates, which are both 3.8%, and they share nearly identical numbers of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander residents. While they share these traits, some gaps are widening; for example, the age difference between the two has grown since 2011, and the gap in home ownership has also increased.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 5,343
- First area, 2016: 5,747
- First area, 2021: 6,084
- Second area, 2011: 7,984
- Second area, 2016: 8,293
- Second area, 2021: 8,858
- First area, 2011: 33 yrs
- First area, 2016: 34 yrs
- First area, 2021: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 45 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 0.3% males, 0.2% females; 85+ in Proserpine: 0.8% males, 1.3% females
- 80–84 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 0.3% males, 0.3% females; 80–84 in Proserpine: 1.1% males, 1.0% females
- 75–79 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 1.1% males, 1.0% females; 75–79 in Proserpine: 2.2% males, 1.8% females
- 70–74 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 1.7% males, 1.6% females; 70–74 in Proserpine: 3.0% males, 2.8% females
- 65–69 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 2.0% males, 1.9% females; 65–69 in Proserpine: 3.7% males, 3.3% females
- 60–64 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 3.1% males, 2.8% females; 60–64 in Proserpine: 4.0% males, 3.8% females
- 55–59 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 3.7% males, 4.0% females; 55–59 in Proserpine: 3.9% males, 3.5% females
- 50–54 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 3.8% males, 3.0% females; 50–54 in Proserpine: 3.5% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 3.6% males, 3.4% females; 45–49 in Proserpine: 3.7% males, 3.9% females
- 40–44 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 3.7% males, 3.9% females; 40–44 in Proserpine: 3.0% males, 3.0% females
- 35–39 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 3.2% males, 3.7% females; 35–39 in Proserpine: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
- 30–34 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 3.2% males, 3.6% females; 30–34 in Proserpine: 2.6% males, 2.6% females
- 25–29 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 3.0% males, 3.4% females; 25–29 in Proserpine: 2.1% males, 2.0% females
- 20–24 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 2.6% males, 2.4% females; 20–24 in Proserpine: 1.8% males, 1.7% females
- 15–19 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 3.5% males, 3.3% females; 15–19 in Proserpine: 3.5% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 4.2% males, 4.3% females; 10–14 in Proserpine: 3.6% males, 3.5% females
- 5–9 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 4.1% males, 4.1% females; 5–9 in Proserpine: 3.4% males, 2.9% females
- 0–4 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 0–4 in Proserpine: 2.5% males, 2.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $814
- First area, 2016: $761
- First area, 2021: $940
- Second area, 2011: $556
- Second area, 2016: $620
- Second area, 2021: $722
- First area, 2011: $1,894
- First area, 2016: $1,727
- First area, 2021: $2,085
- Second area, 2011: $1,079
- Second area, 2016: $1,242
- Second area, 2021: $1,431
- First area, 2011: $2,083
- First area, 2016: $2,001
- First area, 2021: $2,316
- Second area, 2011: $1,323
- Second area, 2016: $1,485
- Second area, 2021: $1,792
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $400
- First area, 2016: $300
- First area, 2021: $380
- Second area, 2011: $220
- Second area, 2016: $250
- Second area, 2021: $276
- First area, 2011: $2,200
- First area, 2016: $2,080
- First area, 2021: $1,733
- Second area, 2011: $1,602
- Second area, 2016: $1,603
- Second area, 2021: $1,560
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Shoal Point - Bucasia with nearby areas
Compare Proserpine with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Shoal Point - Bucasia vs Proserpine [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/312021354/shoal-point-bucasia/vs/312031361/proserpine