Compare
Shoal Point - Bucasia vs West Mackay
Statistical Area 2 (SA2) comparison ≈ 14 km apart · Shoal Point - Bucasia profile · West Mackay profile
Shoal Point - Bucasia West Mackay
West Mackay and Shoal Point - Bucasia are nearby areas with very different layouts. West Mackay is very walkable, with 98.7% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a a local amenity and a typical resident aged 41. In contrast, Shoal Point - Bucasia is mostly car-dependent, where 90.5% of homes are separate houses and 86.5% have three or more bedrooms. Shoal Point - Bucasia is younger, with children under 15 making up 22.8% of the population, compared to 17% in West Mackay.
Everyday life shares many similarities, as both areas have nearly identical unemployment rates and the same proportion of people working from home. They also have similar shares of overseas-born residents and people who have served in the Defence Force. While these commonalities exist, some gaps are widening; the difference in the share of people reporting no religion has grown since 2011, and the gap in bachelor's degree qualifications has also increased.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 5,343
- First area, 2016: 5,747
- First area, 2021: 6,084
- Second area, 2011: 6,507
- Second area, 2016: 6,160
- Second area, 2021: 6,364
- First area, 2011: 33 yrs
- First area, 2016: 34 yrs
- First area, 2021: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 0.3% males, 0.2% females; 85+ in West Mackay: 1.4% males, 3.0% females
- 80–84 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 0.3% males, 0.3% females; 80–84 in West Mackay: 1.2% males, 1.8% females
- 75–79 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 1.1% males, 1.0% females; 75–79 in West Mackay: 1.4% males, 1.7% females
- 70–74 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 1.7% males, 1.6% females; 70–74 in West Mackay: 2.0% males, 2.1% females
- 65–69 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 2.0% males, 1.9% females; 65–69 in West Mackay: 3.0% males, 2.7% females
- 60–64 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 3.1% males, 2.8% females; 60–64 in West Mackay: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 55–59 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 3.7% males, 4.0% females; 55–59 in West Mackay: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 50–54 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 3.8% males, 3.0% females; 50–54 in West Mackay: 3.6% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 3.6% males, 3.4% females; 45–49 in West Mackay: 3.5% males, 2.9% females
- 40–44 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 3.7% males, 3.9% females; 40–44 in West Mackay: 2.8% males, 3.3% females
- 35–39 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 3.2% males, 3.7% females; 35–39 in West Mackay: 3.5% males, 3.6% females
- 30–34 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 3.2% males, 3.6% females; 30–34 in West Mackay: 2.7% males, 3.1% females
- 25–29 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 3.0% males, 3.4% females; 25–29 in West Mackay: 3.6% males, 3.0% females
- 20–24 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 2.6% males, 2.4% females; 20–24 in West Mackay: 3.3% males, 3.0% females
- 15–19 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 3.5% males, 3.3% females; 15–19 in West Mackay: 2.5% males, 2.4% females
- 10–14 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 4.2% males, 4.3% females; 10–14 in West Mackay: 3.1% males, 2.9% females
- 5–9 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 4.1% males, 4.1% females; 5–9 in West Mackay: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
- 0–4 in Shoal Point - Bucasia: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 0–4 in West Mackay: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $814
- First area, 2016: $761
- First area, 2021: $940
- Second area, 2011: $670
- Second area, 2016: $690
- Second area, 2021: $842
- First area, 2011: $1,894
- First area, 2016: $1,727
- First area, 2021: $2,085
- Second area, 2011: $1,300
- Second area, 2016: $1,270
- Second area, 2021: $1,694
- First area, 2011: $2,083
- First area, 2016: $2,001
- First area, 2021: $2,316
- Second area, 2011: $1,710
- Second area, 2016: $1,748
- Second area, 2021: $2,236
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $400
- First area, 2016: $300
- First area, 2021: $380
- Second area, 2011: $300
- Second area, 2016: $250
- Second area, 2021: $320
- First area, 2011: $2,200
- First area, 2016: $2,080
- First area, 2021: $1,733
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $1,733
- Second area, 2021: $1,587
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Economy & Advantage
Environment & Climate
Walkability
Compare Shoal Point - Bucasia with nearby areas
Compare West Mackay with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Shoal Point - Bucasia vs West Mackay [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sa2/312021354/shoal-point-bucasia/vs/312021358/west-mackay